[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [flang][OpenMP] Allow UPDATE clause to not have any arguments (PR #137521)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-parser Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz) Changes The UPDATE clause can be specified on both ATOMIC and DEPOBJ directives. Currently, the ATOMIC directive has its own handling of it, and the definition of the UPDATE clause only supports its u

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [flang][OpenMP] Allow UPDATE clause to not have any arguments (PR #137521)

kparzysz wrote: Previous PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137517 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137521 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenACC][OpenMP] Separate implementations of ATOMIC constructs (PR #137517)

kparzysz wrote: Previous PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137460 Next PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137521 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137517 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [flang][OpenMP] Allow UPDATE clause to not have any arguments (PR #137521)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-semantics Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz) Changes The UPDATE clause can be specified on both ATOMIC and DEPOBJ directives. Currently, the ATOMIC directive has its own handling of it, and the definition of the UPDATE clause only supports it

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [flang][OpenMP] Allow UPDATE clause to not have any arguments (PR #137521)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-openmp Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz) Changes The UPDATE clause can be specified on both ATOMIC and DEPOBJ directives. Currently, the ATOMIC directive has its own handling of it, and the definition of the UPDATE clause only supports its u

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [flang][OpenMP] Allow UPDATE clause to not have any arguments (PR #137521)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-fir-hlfir Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz) Changes The UPDATE clause can be specified on both ATOMIC and DEPOBJ directives. Currently, the ATOMIC directive has its own handling of it, and the definition of the UPDATE clause only supports it

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [flang][OpenMP] Allow UPDATE clause to not have any arguments (PR #137521)

https://github.com/kparzysz created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137521 The UPDATE clause can be specified on both ATOMIC and DEPOBJ directives. Currently, the ATOMIC directive has its own handling of it, and the definition of the UPDATE clause only supports its use in the DEPOBJ

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenACC][OpenMP] Separate implementations of ATOMIC constructs (PR #137517)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-openacc Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz) Changes The OpenMP implementation of the ATOMIC construct will change in the near future to accommodate OpenMP 6.0. This patch separates the shared implementations to avoid interfering with OpenACC. ---

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenACC][OpenMP] Separate implementations of ATOMIC constructs (PR #137517)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-fir-hlfir Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz) Changes The OpenMP implementation of the ATOMIC construct will change in the near future to accommodate OpenMP 6.0. This patch separates the shared implementations to avoid interfering with OpenACC

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenACC][OpenMP] Separate implementations of ATOMIC constructs (PR #137517)

https://github.com/kparzysz created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137517 The OpenMP implementation of the ATOMIC construct will change in the near future to accommodate OpenMP 6.0. This patch separates the shared implementations to avoid interfering with OpenACC. >From 69869a7673c

[llvm-branch-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Fix SBTarget::ReadInstruction with flavor (PR #136034)

da-viper wrote: Fix crash when calling `SBTarget::GetInstruction()` with the flavor parameter. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136034 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [SelectionDAG][X86] Widen <2 x T> vector types for atomic load (PR #120598)

arsenm wrote: Can you stop making no-op updates to these PRs? If there is an update, there should be some reviewable change. Right now this is just spamming everyones notifications https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120598 ___ llvm-branch-com