llvmbot wrote:
@petrhosek What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119051
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 18af3fc1bf8855e1e166e64a9210ed07d610aa54
Requested by: @tstellar
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119051.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/utils/perf-training/perf-helper.
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119051
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119051
Backport 18af3fc1bf8855e1e166e64a9210ed07d610aa54
Requested by: @tstellar
>From 0b1ed9168731f0bee35542988ec9867ebd3cfc47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 18:34:59 -0800
Subject
https://github.com/wangzpgi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119035
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/clementval created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119035
Process `gpu.return` in AbstractResult pass when the function is a `gpu.func`.
>From 72a892909a7ce898423cea709f674956dc2121d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Valentin Clement
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 13:42:06 -
Meinersbur wrote:
@h-vetinari I completed rebase and cleanup. Now would be a great time to have
another look.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110217
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-fir-hlfir
Author: Valentin Clement (バレンタイン クレメン) (clementval)
Changes
Process `gpu.return` in AbstractResult pass when the function is a `gpu.func`.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119035.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modi
https://github.com/5chmidti approved this pull request.
Nice catch, LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118990
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branc
https://github.com/kstoimenov approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119013
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
This fix the case, when single hot inlined callsite, prevent
checks for all other. This helps to reduce number of removed checks up to 50%
(deppedes on `cutoff-hot` value) .
`ScalarOptimizerLateEPCallback`
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119013
This fix the case, when single hot inlined callsite, prevent
checks for all other. This helps to reduce number of removed checks up to 50%
(deppedes on `cutoff-hot` value) .
`ScalarOptimizerLateEPCallback` w
zeroomega wrote:
Change b5bd1928c6d43bc525a4e3fb65d2c750d61e broke llvm's windows bots. See
: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/63/builds/2944 and this patch is the
only commit in the blame list.
I reverted this patch in 12bdeba76eef1c7adf004a280036a7fb690ba573. Please
reland the c
JDevlieghere wrote:
This also broke the Darwin LLDB bots:
https://ci.swift.org/view/all/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/
https://ci.swift.org/view/all/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/
Given they've been red for 15h and broke various other bots, can you please
revert while you in
luporl wrote:
This also broke the build of
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/141/builds/4432.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83237
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118990
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Congcong Cai (HerrCai0907)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118990.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified)
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/ReturnConstRefFromParameterCheck.cpp
(+6-8)
- (modifie
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118990
None
>From 2fb6e21f63a16b5bde5401a4e1cb68af1405a258 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 23:45:56 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] fix false positive in lambda expr for
retu
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-12-06T15:16:34+01:00
New Revision: 0320d20dbdcafec2a090006c9674f642e207db27
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0320d20dbdcafec2a090006c9674f642e207db27
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0320d20dbdcafec2a090006c9674f642e207db27.diff
LOG:
artempyanykh wrote:
Abandoned due to a change in #118622.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118626
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/artempyanykh closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118626
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
slydiman wrote:
[Commit
b5bd192](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b5bd1928c6d43bc525a4e3fb65d2c750d61e)
break buildbots
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/195/builds/1985
https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/197/builds/1161
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83
https://github.com/artempyanykh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118630
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/artempyanykh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118629
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/artempyanykh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118623
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/artempyanykh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118625
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/artempyanykh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118622
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/artempyanykh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118628
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/artempyanykh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118627
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/artempyanykh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118624
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -79,14 +79,16 @@ struct ValueMapConfig {
static mutex_type *getMutex(const ExtraDataT &/*Data*/) { return nullptr; }
};
+/// This type stores Metadata. Used in ValueMap.
+using MDMapT = DenseMap;
artempyanykh wrote:
@felipepiovezan good call! Let me just
Meinersbur wrote:
As @jeanPerier correctly pointed out to me, some buildbots would start failing
with this patch, at least those running the Test-Suite using Flang will fail
since the runtime is needed to correctly exectute applications, but also two
builders that build the runtime out-of-tree
@@ -1441,8 +1441,10 @@ collectSanitizerRuntimes(const ToolChain &TC, const
ArgList &Args,
if (SanArgs.needsScudoRt()) {
SharedRuntimes.push_back("scudo_standalone");
}
-if (SanArgs.needsTsanRt())
+if (SanArgs.needsTsanRt() && SanArgs.linkRuntimes())
-
https://github.com/fhahn edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76260
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -1441,8 +1441,10 @@ collectSanitizerRuntimes(const ToolChain &TC, const
ArgList &Args,
if (SanArgs.needsScudoRt()) {
SharedRuntimes.push_back("scudo_standalone");
}
-if (SanArgs.needsTsanRt())
+if (SanArgs.needsTsanRt() && SanArgs.linkRuntimes())
https://github.com/fhahn commented:
> LGTM with comments addressed. (I haven't looked carefully at the non-clang
> parts; this is just approval for the clang changes.)
Thanks! Any chance you would be able to help with the review of the LLVM side
as well? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/p
optimisan wrote:
### Merge activity
* **Dec 6, 4:43 AM EST**: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull
request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/118779).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118779
___
https://github.com/optimisan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118779
>From d48e889915d463cc32f6c5d3e6ce788fb7f44cea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akshat Oke
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 10:05:30 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [CodeGen][PM] Initialize analyses with isAnalysis=true
Analys
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> So the meaning of stacked PR in this series of patches is pretty
> questionable. So I feel it is better to merge these PRs into a single commit
> so that it is easier to be cherry-picked and reverted in my experience
+100, this is definitely the right call.
... and I wis
https://github.com/optimisan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118779
>From d48e889915d463cc32f6c5d3e6ce788fb7f44cea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akshat Oke
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 10:05:30 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [CodeGen][PM] Initialize analyses with isAnalysis=true
Analys
40 matches
Mail list logo
