ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > what the code does is: when we write a on-disk hash table, try to write the
> > imported merged hash table in the same process so that we don't need to
> > read these tables again. However, in line 329 the function will try to omit
> > the data from imported table with th
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99285
>From 201bca06d4e75bc4fa24ac269ad7b9750f24616f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:01:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [LLVM][Coroutines] Transform "coro_elide_safe" calls to
swi
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99283
>From 0c712a2fbc5b44e892b37085dbace8ba974c1238 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:22:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [LLVM][Coroutines] Create `.noalloc` variant of switch ABI
c
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99285
>From 201bca06d4e75bc4fa24ac269ad7b9750f24616f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:01:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [LLVM][Coroutines] Transform "coro_elide_safe" calls to
swi
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99283
>From 0c712a2fbc5b44e892b37085dbace8ba974c1238 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:22:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [LLVM][Coroutines] Create `.noalloc` variant of switch ABI
c
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > what the code does is: when we write a on-disk hash table, try to write the
> > imported merged hash table in the same process so that we don't need to
> > read these tables again. However, in line 329 the function will try to omit
> > the data from imported table with th
Author: Mingming Liu
Date: 2024-09-08T16:45:07-07:00
New Revision: 2b33fbee3f36344786fa63b189387c3bd90c4c3f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2b33fbee3f36344786fa63b189387c3bd90c4c3f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2b33fbee3f36344786fa63b189387c3bd90c4c3f.diff
grypp wrote:
nit: `lowterings` typo
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107659
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -84,7 +87,7 @@ llvm.func @llvm_nvvm_barrier0() {
// CHECK-SAME: i32 %[[barId:.*]], i32 %[[numThreads:.*]])
llvm.func @llvm_nvvm_barrier(%barID : i32, %numberOfThreads : i32) {
// CHECK: call void @llvm.nvvm.barrier0()
- nvvm.barrier
+ nvvm.barrier
grypp
@@ -699,9 +699,21 @@ gpu.module @test_module_32 {
}
gpu.module @test_module_33 {
-// CHECK-LABEL: func @kernel_with_block_size()
-// CHECK: attributes {gpu.kernel, gpu.known_block_size = array, nvvm.kernel, nvvm.maxntid = array}
- gpu.func @kernel_with_block_size() kernel att
@@ -1784,53 +1799,53 @@ def NVVM_CpAsyncBulkWaitGroupOp :
NVVM_Op<"cp.async.bulk.wait_group">,
}];
}
-def NVVM_CpAsyncBulkTensorGlobalToSharedClusterOp :
- NVVM_Op<"cp.async.bulk.tensor.shared.cluster.global",
- [DeclareOpInterfaceMethods,
+def NVVM_CpAsyncBulkTensorGl
@@ -209,7 +209,12 @@ struct GPULaneIdOpToNVVM :
ConvertOpToLLVMPattern {
ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
auto loc = op->getLoc();
MLIRContext *context = rewriter.getContext();
-Value newOp = rewriter.create(loc, rewriter.getI
@@ -209,7 +209,12 @@ struct GPULaneIdOpToNVVM :
ConvertOpToLLVMPattern {
ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
auto loc = op->getLoc();
MLIRContext *context = rewriter.getContext();
-Value newOp = rewriter.create(loc, rewriter.getI
https://github.com/grypp commented:
Thanks for doing that. I think this is going be very useful. I left some
comments
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107659
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
https://github.com/grypp edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107659
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
I don't think this should be backported in the current form, because it breaks
ABI. This is not strictly impossible at this stage, but also very undesirable.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106008
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing
16 matches
Mail list logo