mtrofin wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/107499?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";
https://github.com/mtrofin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107499
None
>From e90265db97747c0b15f81b31f061e299ffd33138 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mircea Trofin
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 12:52:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [ctx_prof] Insert the ctx prof flattener after the module
llvmbot wrote:
@arsenm What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107466
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107466
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107466
Backport 2e0ded3371f8d42f376bdfd4d70687537e36818e
Requested by: @jrtc27
>From 66968ee023596c5674d1e94c98e8d7d2a069a69c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: R-Goc <131907007+r-...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed,
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===- PGOCtxProfFlattening.cpp - Contextual Instr. Flattening
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+//===- PGOCtxProfFlattening.cpp - Contextual Instr. Flattening
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+//===- PGOCtxProfFlattening.cpp - Contextual Instr. Flattening
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+//===- PGOCtxProfFlattening.cpp - Contextual Instr. Flattening
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===- PGOCtxProfFlattening.cpp - Contextual Instr. Flattening
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===- PGOCtxProfFlattening.cpp - Contextual Instr. Flattening
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/mtrofin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107329
>From 856568c07d924dd59aaa81450cb8bcb64d60d2eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mircea Trofin
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 21:28:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [ctx_prof] Flattened profile lowering pass
---
llvm/include/llv
aemerson wrote:
To justify this for the 19 release: this is easily triggered by small IR so we
should take this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107435
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
https://github.com/aemerson approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107435
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107184
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+//===- PGOCtxProfFlattening.cpp - Contextual Instr. Flattening
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+//===- PGOCtxProfFlattening.cpp - Contextual Instr. Flattening
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+//===- PGOCtxProfFlattening.cpp - Contextual Instr. Flattening
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+//===- PGOCtxProfFlattening.cpp - Contextual Instr. Flattening
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/mtrofin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107329
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
aaupov wrote:
> Didn't realize yaml profile currently doesn't have probe inline tree encoded.
> This can increase profile size a bit, just making sure that's not a concern
> for yaml profile.
Good call. Including probe inline tree does increase the size of yaml profile
by about 2x pre- and po
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 91a3c6f3d66b866bcda8a0f7d4815bc8f2dbd86c
Requested by: @sdesmalen-arm
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107435.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AArch64
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107435
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107435
Backport 91a3c6f3d66b866bcda8a0f7d4815bc8f2dbd86c
Requested by: @sdesmalen-arm
>From a943f987d44647f38ae4c5c2d1f69b8f666e16ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sander de Smalen
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 17:54:57 +010
https://github.com/aemerson approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107406
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100389
>From d51a155348284c6fe453190d87d36f3f63e1f456 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 09:06:59 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] DAG: Lower fcNormal is.fpclass to compare with inf
Looks worse f
https://github.com/paulwalker-arm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107406
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107406
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107406
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Sander de Smalen (sdesmalen-arm)
Changes
The functionality to make use of SVE's load/store pair instructions for the
callee-saves is broken because the offsets used in the instructions are
incorrect.
This is addressed by #10551
WenleiHe wrote:
Didn't realize yaml profile currently doesn't have probe inline tree encoded.
This can increase profile size a bit, just making sure that's not a concern for
yaml profile.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107137
___
llvm-bra
jayfoad wrote:
> > This sounds sketchy to me. Is it really valid to enter a second call inside
> > another call's CALLSEQ markers, but only if we avoid adding a second nested
> > set of markers? It feels like attacking the symptom of the issue, but not
> > the root cause. (I'm not certain it's
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107212
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
https://github.com/ritter-x2a updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106965
>From a647e4446cbcc1018c1298ee411c80a855dc4ad9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Ritter
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 05:37:33 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [X86] Avoid generating nested CALLSEQ for TLS pointer
functio
@@ -287,3 +287,117 @@ been implemented, but it is closely linked to the
`omp.canonical_loop` work.
Nevertheless, loop transformation that the `collapse` clause for
loop-associated
worksharing constructs defines can be represented by introducing multiple
bounds, step and induc
https://github.com/skatrak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107236
>From da68c8b8be9588251bb4342e869a52035fc45a8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergio Afonso
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 13:21:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [MLIR][OpenMP] NFC: Document compound constructs
representat
https://github.com/tblah approved this pull request.
LGTM, thank you for writing all of these
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107236
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailma
https://github.com/tblah approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107235
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tblah approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107234
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-pgo
Author: Rainer Orth (rorth)
Changes
As detailed in Issue #101667, two `profile` tests `FAIL` on 32-bit
SPARC, both Linux/sparc64 and Solaris/sparcv9 (where the tests work when
enabled):
```
Profile-sparc :: ContinuousSyncMode/runtime-counter-relo
https://github.com/rorth edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107362
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/rorth created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107362
As detailed in Issue #101667, two `profile` tests `FAIL` on 32-bit SPARC, both
Linux/sparc64 and Solaris/sparcv9 (where the tests work when enabled):
```
Profile-sparc :: ContinuousSyncMode/runtime-counter-reloc
https://github.com/rorth milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107362
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ritter-x2a wrote:
> This sounds sketchy to me. Is it really valid to enter a second call inside
> another call's CALLSEQ markers, but only if we avoid adding a second nested
> set of markers? It feels like attacking the symptom of the issue, but not the
> root cause. (I'm not certain it's _not
https://github.com/ritter-x2a updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106965
>From c332034894c9fa3de26daedb28a977a3580dc4d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Ritter
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 05:37:33 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [X86] Avoid generating nested CALLSEQ for TLS pointer
functio
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64 -verify-machineinstrs < %s -relocation-model=pic |
FileCheck %s
ritter-x2a wrote:
I think -verify-machineinstrs is
46 matches
Mail list logo
