https://github.com/owenca milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94091
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
…ing literals (#92214)
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94091.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp (+5-3)
- (modified) clang/unittests/Format/F
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94091
…ing literals (#92214)
>From 88711473d2affcb21703e7b4f78420c512192acf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 20:13:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] release/18.x: [clang-format] Don't always break
Author: gulfemsavrun
Date: 2024-05-31T20:05:03-07:00
New Revision: e6c1256867d6992d5affca539a8dab6541f8db9e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6c1256867d6992d5affca539a8dab6541f8db9e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6c1256867d6992d5affca539a8dab6541f8db9e.diff
https://github.com/ahmedbougacha closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93907
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ojhunt closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94054
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Oliver Hunt (ojhunt)
Changes
---
Patch is 245.54 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94054.diff
53 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/AST/ASTContext.h (+13)
https://github.com/ojhunt converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94054
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ahmedbougacha wrote:
> Why do we want a separate builtin, as opposed to just constant-folding calls
> to __builtin_ptrauth_sign?
That's a good question. Mechanically, I assumed constant-evaluating
`__builtin_ptrauth_sign_unauthenticated` would be a challenge, but looking
around it doesn't se
chapuni wrote:
@tstellar @whentojump They will make clang able to build and test clang itself
with MC/DC instrumentation.
I really hope they could be pulled. Thank you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93723
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing li
https://github.com/ahmedbougacha closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93984
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
whentojump wrote:
Thanks for the info.
Will you please consider
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare/release/18.x...chapuni:llvm-project:release/18.x,
which fixes an assertion violation? If so, I can do a PR.
cc @chapuni
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93723
__
tstellar wrote:
@whentojump Yes, but I'm only going to accept critical fixes or regressions for
this one.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93723
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cg
https://github.com/aaupov edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93760
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Paul T Robinson
Date: 2024-05-31T13:13:21-04:00
New Revision: 8ce093226b730338a8faacb4ef09f97bcbc17515
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ce093226b730338a8faacb4ef09f97bcbc17515
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ce093226b730338a8faacb4ef09f97bcbc17515.dif
samolisov wrote:
@aeubanks my intent is to get no `__llvm_profile_raw_version` in modules where
nothing was actually instrumented. Usually, in my cases, they are the modules
for regular-LTO part in thin-LTO where split LTO Units are enabled. This is a
good point about consistency and using th
github-actions[bot] wrote:
⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to contribute
to the repo. Please turn off [Keep my email addresses
private](https://github.com/settings/emails) setting in your account. See
[LLVM
Discourse](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/hidden-email
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Oliver Hunt (ojhunt)
Changes
Minor correction to match current API
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93984.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp (+1-1)
``diff
diff --git a/
https://github.com/ojhunt created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93984
Minor correction to match current API
>From 0262fdfddf50853d2f40ea86c37877168ad070a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt <4691426+ojh...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 09:36:32 -0700
Subje
aeubanks wrote:
What's the benefit to this change? From a compile time perspective, files
containing no functions are essentially negligible. From a consistency
perspective, not adding `__llvm_profile_raw_version` in some cases creates
divergence between different source files (IIRC we do some
jayfoad wrote:
Too late to backport - no more 18.x releases are planned.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90582
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch
https://github.com/jayfoad closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90582
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ojhunt wrote:
Build fix is trivial
`diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
index 82c4a3c86645..e9a867ff67ba 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
@@ -9246,7 +9246,7 @@ static void handleVTablePointerAuthenticati
@@ -626,29 +626,49 @@ static void __parse_leap_seconds(vector&
__leap_seconds, istream&&
// seconds since 1 January 1970.
constexpr auto __offset = sys_days{1970y / January / 1} - sys_days{1900y /
January / 1};
- while (true) {
-switch (__input.peek()) {
-case i
mikaelholmen wrote:
> > Hello @fmayer !
> > If I compile this patch with UBSan (-DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER='Undefined') and
> > run tests, I see the following for many many lit tests:
> > ```
> > ../include/llvm/Support/CommandLine.h:601:13: runtime error: load of value
> > 2, which is not a valid va
25 matches
Mail list logo
