[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] 293c27f - Revert "Reland "[Win32][ELF] Make CodeView a DebugInfoFormat only for COFF fo…"

Author: Phoebe Wang Date: 2024-04-10T14:36:38+08:00 New Revision: 293c27f9137ea45a401ac74d84799d11b193fefd URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/293c27f9137ea45a401ac74d84799d11b193fefd DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/293c27f9137ea45a401ac74d84799d11b193fefd.diff L

[llvm-branch-commits] [libc] 434bbc9 - Revert "[libc] implement ioctl (#85890)"

Author: lntue Date: 2024-04-09T23:46:21-04:00 New Revision: 434bbc9b750a19e78da91e864749ca37995b42e7 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/434bbc9b750a19e78da91e864749ca37995b42e7 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/434bbc9b750a19e78da91e864749ca37995b42e7.diff LOG: Re

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

https://github.com/aaupov updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87967 >From c856716bbb987e09ee86b31287808736ef4f2f9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amir Ayupov Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 04:52:43 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Added test Created using spr 1.3.4 --- bolt/include/bolt/Core/B

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

https://github.com/maksfb approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87967 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

maksfb wrote: Okay. That explains the increase. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87967 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

aaupov wrote: > > > Creating a proper FDE entry is the right thing to do regardless of BAT. > > > How large is the regression? > > > > > > The largest I've seen is 34M->39M (HHVM instrumentation). > > Did you check if we patch every single function in he original `.text`? How > many function

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

maksfb wrote: > > Creating a proper FDE entry is the right thing to do regardless of BAT. How > > large is the regression? > > The largest I've seen is 34M->39M (HHVM instrumentation). Did you check if we patch every single function in he original `.text`? How many functions are there? https

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

https://github.com/aaupov updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87967 >From c856716bbb987e09ee86b31287808736ef4f2f9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amir Ayupov Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 04:52:43 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Added test Created using spr 1.3.4 --- bolt/include/bolt/Core/B

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

aaupov wrote: > > > Let's make `hasCFI()` return true for injected functions. > > > > > > Given that this change increases the size of eh_frame section, should we > > make it dependent on `enable-bat`, i.e. when we expect to feed the binary > > back to BOLT? > > Because otherwise this "fix" i

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] release/18.x: [Headers] Don't declare unreachable() from stddef.h in C++ (#86748) (PR #87696)

ian-twilightcoder wrote: @tstellar is there anything else I need to do for this one? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87696 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

maksfb wrote: > > Let's make `hasCFI()` return true for injected functions. > > Given that this change increases the size of eh_frame section, should we make > it dependent on `enable-bat`, i.e. when we expect to feed the binary back to > BOLT? > > Because otherwise this "fix" is a pure size

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] 7c83625 - Revert "[Flang] [OpenMP] [Semantics] [MLIR] [Lowering] Add lowering support f…"

Author: Raghu Maddhipatla Date: 2024-04-09T16:18:05-05:00 New Revision: 7c83625771a8746865c1026d17b35c126a4f1f88 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c83625771a8746865c1026d17b35c126a4f1f88 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c83625771a8746865c1026d17b35c126a4f1f88.d

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [lit][ci] Publish lit wheels (#88072) (PR #88155)

https://github.com/tru approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88155 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] 6c25843 - Revert "[ADT] Use `adl_*` wrappers across STLExtras (#87936)"

Author: Jakub Kuderski Date: 2024-04-09T13:18:20-04:00 New Revision: 6c25843c67e4bf5d14e864dabdb0c80500d12535 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6c25843c67e4bf5d14e864dabdb0c80500d12535 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6c25843c67e4bf5d14e864dabdb0c80500d12535.diff

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [lit][ci] Publish lit wheels (#88072) (PR #88155)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-github-workflow Author: None (llvmbot) Changes Backport 8a8ab8f70cbb5507d1aa55efcd9c6e61ad4e891c Requested by: @seldridge --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88155.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) .github/workflows/release-li

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [lit][ci] Publish lit wheels (#88072) (PR #88155)

llvmbot wrote: @tru What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88155 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/l

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [lit][ci] Publish lit wheels (#88072) (PR #88155)

https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88155 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [lit][ci] Publish lit wheels (#88072) (PR #88155)

https://github.com/llvmbot created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88155 Backport 8a8ab8f70cbb5507d1aa55efcd9c6e61ad4e891c Requested by: @seldridge >From 4e7b0b41a2688800aad36afbefa72575c95e3214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Schuyler Eldridge Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:55:17 -0400 Su

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [Serialization] Code cleanups and polish 83233 (PR #83237)

ilya-biryukov wrote: We have hit quite a few issues when trying this out. I have spent a day trying to reduce to a small repro that I can share, but haven't not fully succeeded yet, I will continue tomorrow. Still wanted to share the error descriptions in case that would allow to make progress

[llvm-branch-commits] Reland "[compiler-rt] Allow running tests without installing first" (PR #88075)

https://github.com/arichardson updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88075 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] Reland "[compiler-rt] Allow running tests without installing first" (PR #88075)

arichardson wrote: > > @mstorsjo It would be great if you could test this on windows. > > Thanks, this does seem to run fine in my configuration! Thank you very much for testing! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88075 ___ llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

aaupov wrote: > Let's make `hasCFI()` return true for injected functions. Given that this change increases the size of eh_frame section, should we make it dependent on `enable-bat`, i.e. when we expect to feed the binary back to BOLT? Because otherwise this "fix" is a pure size regression. h

[llvm-branch-commits] Reland "[compiler-rt] Allow running tests without installing first" (PR #88075)

mstorsjo wrote: > @mstorsjo It would be great if you could test this on windows. Thanks, this does seem to run fine in my configuration! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88075 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llv

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

https://github.com/aaupov ready_for_review https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87967 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

https://github.com/aaupov edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87967 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Emit empty FDE for injected functions (PR #87967)

https://github.com/aaupov updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87967 >From c856716bbb987e09ee86b31287808736ef4f2f9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amir Ayupov Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 04:52:43 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Added test Created using spr 1.3.4 --- bolt/include/bolt/Core/Binar

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [mlir] [MLIR][Flang][OpenMP] Make omp.simdloop into a loop wrapper (PR #87365)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-llvm Author: Sergio Afonso (skatrak) Changes This patch updates the definition of `omp.simdloop` to enforce the restrictions of a wrapper operation. It has been renamed to `omp.simd`, to better reflect the naming used in the spec. All uses of "sim

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [mlir] [MLIR][Flang][OpenMP] Make omp.simdloop into a loop wrapper (PR #87365)

https://github.com/skatrak ready_for_review https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87365 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [mlir] [MLIR][Flang][OpenMP] Make omp.simdloop into a loop wrapper (PR #87365)

https://github.com/skatrak edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87365 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Make omp.simdloop into a loop wrapper (PR #87365)

https://github.com/skatrak edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87365 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [llvm] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Make omp.simdloop into a loop wrapper (PR #87365)

https://github.com/skatrak updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87365 >From 3bcb4198c25d08ff7b4a220715fbe5e27e12414c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Afonso Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:20:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [MLIR][Flang][OpenMP] Make omp.simdloop into a loop wrapper This