[lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

Hello all, While debugging and printing struct with multi-dimensional char array, gdb successfully prints string while lldb bails out with only printing address. For simple C testcase, struct b { char i[2][4]; }; int main() { struct b z; z.i[0][0] = 'F'; z.i[0][1

[lldb-dev] [11.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 6 is here

Hello once again, A few more issues appeared, so here is yet another release candidate: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6 was just tagged. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/11.0.0/#rc6 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6 Pre-built binaries w

[lldb-dev] n00b error running lldb tests on windows?

Hi, I'm trying to run the lldb tests on Windows (fresh installs of VS2019 16.7.5, Python 3.8.5, and Swig 4.0.2). The API tests crash immediately in python initialization code: Windows fatal exception: access violation Current thread 0x693c (most recent call first): File "", line 219 in

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47743] LLDB displays wrong values for packed bitfields

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47743 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |lab...@google.com --- Comment #3 from lab...

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

There isn’t a built-in summary formatter for two dimensional arrays of chars, but the type is matching the regex for the one-dimensional StringSummaryFormat, but that doesn’t actually know how to format two dimensional arrays of chars. The type regex for StringSummaryFormat: char [[0-9]+] We

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

On 07/10/2020 20:42, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev wrote: There isn’t a built-in summary formatter for two dimensional arrays of chars, but the type is matching the regex for the one-dimensional StringSummaryFormat, but that doesn’t actually know how to format two dimensional arrays of chars.  The ty

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > > On 07/10/2020 20:42, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev wrote: >> There isn’t a built-in summary formatter for two dimensional arrays of >> chars, but the type is matching the regex for the one-dimensional >> StringSummaryFormat, but that doesn’t ac

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

On 07/10/2020 21:01, Jim Ingham wrote: On Oct 7, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Pavel Labath > wrote: On 07/10/2020 20:42, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev wrote: There isn’t a built-in summary formatter for two dimensional arrays of chars, but the type is matching the regex for the one-d

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Pavel Labath wrote: > > On 07/10/2020 21:01, Jim Ingham wrote: >>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Pavel Labath >> > wrote: >>> >>> On 07/10/2020 20:42, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev wrote: There isn’t a built-in summary formatter for two dime

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev > wrote: > > > >> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Pavel Labath wrote: >> >> On 07/10/2020 21:01, Jim Ingham wrote: On Oct 7, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Pavel Labath >>> > wrote: On 07/10/2020 20:42, Jim Ing

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 5:29 PM, Greg Clayton wrote: > > > >> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev >> mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Pavel Labath >> > wrote: >>> >>> On 07/10/2020 21:01, Jim Ingham wr

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47758] New: Stop with a watchpoint, only on register values

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47758 Bug ID: 47758 Summary: Stop with a watchpoint, only on register values Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement