Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Processor Trace Support in LLDB

2020-09-18 Thread Vedant Kumar via lldb-dev
Hi Walter & Greg, Thanks for sharing this RFC, and for your work in this area. > On Sep 17, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Walter via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Here I propose, along with Greg Clayton, Processor Trace support for LLDB. > I’m attaching a link to the document that contains this pro

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Processor Trace Support in LLDB

2020-09-18 Thread Walter via lldb-dev
Thanks for your comments, I'll reply here: > Is it possible to decode a small portion of an Intel PT trace file quickly, say, in a few milliseconds? This would be useful if tracing were done in ringbuffer mode, or if the event the user is interested in debugging (along with its relevant execution

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Processor Trace Support in LLDB

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Christopher via lldb-dev
Hi Walter, I've only done a brief scan of the document but, in general, I'm favorable of the goals, aim, and approach. Something I think would be good would be to compare/contrast against rr as an "exploring alternatives" section of the document. I think the document should also be made available/