Hello,
I am trying to debug a simple c program,
int main() {
char arr[] = "Hello World!";
}
On gdb, while printing variable content with force formatting,
(gdb) l
1 int main() {
2 char arr[] = "Hello World!";
3 }
(gdb) b 3
Breakpoint 2 at 0x40050a: file string.c, lin
Hi everyone,
This is just a quick reminder that the upcoming release branch is
scheduled for one week from today: Wednesday, 15 January 2020.
When the branch is created, the trunk version will become 11.0.0.
The full release schedule can be found under "Upcoming Releases" in
the column to the ri
Tom, the 9.0.1 final binaries didn't (yet?) make it to the github release
page https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-9.0.1
I also checked https://releases.llvm.org/ because I recall some debate or
back-and-forth about where the releases should go and/or redirects or links
from
The way lldb works, char[] has a type summary that does two things, 1) presents
the contents as a C-string, and 2) suppresses the actual printing of the
elements. If it hadn't done (2) then you would have seen the elements
formatted as a vector of char's with the format you specified. OTOH (2)
Hi,
I was recently working on a debugging utility code in my app that ultimately
needed to access some of the non-exported symbols from a linked shared library.
This code would only be run under DEBUG builds and is only useful when
debugger's CLI is present. With that constraint I hoped to some
Yes, that's correct. This was added in edadb818e5b.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:19 PM Martin Storsjö wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, Jonas Devlieghere wrote:
>
> > After trying it out I concluded that it should be easy enough to check
> > for the static bindings flag in FindPythonInterpAndLibs.cmake
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 11:17 AM, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I just wanted to let you know that most of the work is complete for
> auto-detecting optional dependencies in LLDB. Unless explicitly
> specified, optional dependencies like editline will be enabled w
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 2:46 PM Adrian Prantl wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 6, 2020, at 11:17 AM, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I just wanted to let you know that most of the work is complete for
> > auto-detecting optional dependencies in LLDB. Unless explicit
Thanks for clarification.
>> It would make sense to pass the summary provider the requested format.
>> SBValue has a GetFormat option, so if the format was properly set on the
>> SBValue before it's passed to the summary provider, that would work already.
>> Then it's up to the summary provid
On 01/08/2020 09:24 AM, Brian Cain wrote:
> Tom, the 9.0.1 final binaries didn't (yet?) make it to the github release
> page https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-9.0.1
>
The binaries have been posted now.
> I also checked https://releases.llvm.org/ because I recall some de
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, Jonas Devlieghere wrote:
Yes, that's correct. This was added in edadb818e5b.
Thanks!
// Martin
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
11 matches
Mail list logo
