On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 23:11 +, Ted Woodward wrote:
> Starting in r372835 (Fix installing Python modules on systems using
> /usr/lib), the finish_swig and installation steps using multi-configuration
> generators (like Visual Studio or XCode) are broken.
>
> The problem is the symlink and ins
"Robinson, Paul via Openmp-dev" writes:
> David Greene, will you be at the LLVM Dev Meeting? If so, could you sign
> up for a Round Table session on this topic? Obviously lots to discuss
> and concerns to be addressed.
That's a great idea. I will be there. I'm also hoping to help run a
routab
Renato Golin via cfe-dev writes:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 22:26, David Greene wrote:
>> That would be a shame. Where is test-suite run right now? Are there
>> bots? How are regressions reported?
>
> There is no shame in making the test-suite better.
That's not what I meant, sorry. I mean it
Hi David,
You answer some of your own questions down below, so I'll try to
collate the responses and shorten my reply.
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 15:20, David Greene wrote:
> How are regressions reported? On llvm-dev?
They're buildbots, exactly like any other. Direct email, llvm-commits,
irc, bugz
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:21 PM David Greene via cfe-dev <
cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Florian Hahn via llvm-dev writes:
>
> >> - Performance varies from implementation to implementation. It is
> >> difficult to keep tests up-to-date for all possible targets and
> >> subtargets.
> >
> > C
The build step works with r374250, but the install step fails. It needs
CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR added to:
install(DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/${LLDB_PYTHON_RELATIVE_PATH}/
DESTINATION ${LLDB_PYTHON_RELATIVE_PATH}
COMPONENT lldb-scripts)
> -Original Message-
>
Sean Silva via cfe-dev writes:
>> We have to support many different systems and those systems are always
>> changing (new processors, new BIOS, new OS, etc.). Performance can vary
>> widely day to day from factors completely outside the compiler's
>> control. As the performance changes you have
Hi,
All the *nix build bots (lldb-x86_86-{debian,fedora}, netbsd-amd64) have
been offline for a while now. Some as far as July 12.
I’m not sure if this is being tracked or whom to contact about this.
Thank you.
- Afonso
--
Best regards,
António Afonso
___
