On 20/08/2019 00:11, Ismail Bennani wrote:
On Aug 19, 2019, at 2:30 PM, Frédéric Riss wrote:
On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:13 AM, Ismail Bennani via lldb-dev
wrote:
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for all your feedbacks.
I’ve been following the discussion closely and find your approach quite
interesting.
A
Hi Bernhard,
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 4:30 PM Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> The only serious issue we've run into so far is that clang crashes when
> trying to build current firefox on x86_64. Will put up a bug report later.
Did you get a chance to file that bug report yet?
Thanks,
Hans
_
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:42 AM Marshall Clow wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 2:23 AM Sylvestre Ledru via cfe-dev
> wrote:
>> One severe regression on Debian on libc++ on mips*
>> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
>>
>> Simon found the regressor!
>>
>> Besides that, we look good
No, there should be no mismatch now. Maybe you ended up using a
version of test-release.sh that doen't have the fixes?
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:47 PM Brian Cain wrote:
>
> When I built rv2 for SLES11 linux I saw the same phase 2/3 mismatch. Is that
> expected?
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 3:15 AM
It is great that you are looking at supporting these fast breakpoints
but I am concerned about the instruction moving code along the same
lines Pavel mentioned. Copying instructions from 1 location to another
is fairly complicated even without considering the issue of jump
targets and jump target d
Oh! Indeed, that was probably it. I'll try again.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, 5:26 AM Hans Wennborg wrote:
> No, there should be no mismatch now. Maybe you ended up using a
> version of test-release.sh that doen't have the fixes?
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:47 PM Brian Cain wrote:
> >
> > When I bu
> On Aug 20, 2019, at 3:30 AM, Tamas Berghammer via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> It is great that you are looking at supporting these fast breakpoints
> but I am concerned about the instruction moving code along the same
> lines Pavel mentioned. Copying instructions from 1 location to another
> is fa
Hi,
While looking at the LLDB test suite, I noticed that the test for
conditional breakpoints (TestBreakpointConditions.py) is skipped on
Windows.
The test has an annotation `skipIfWindows` with a comment:
`# Requires EE to support COFF on Windows (http://llvm.org/pr22232)`
This bug was reported
Thanks!
I’ll remove these annotations from the test and submit a patch.
Ismail
> On Aug 20, 2019, at 2:11 PM, Stella Stamenova wrote:
>
> It looks like the tests are indeed passing on Windows.
>
> Thanks,
> -Stella
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lldb-dev On Behalf Of Ismail Bennani
