Hello Ismail, and wellcome to LLDB. You have a very interesting (and not
entirely trivial) project, and I wish you the best of luck in your work.
I think this will be a very useful addition to lldb.
It sounds like you have researched the problem very well, and the
overall direction looks good
Thanks for your great comments. A few replies...
> On Aug 15, 2019, at 10:10 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hello Ismail, and wellcome to LLDB. You have a very interesting (and not
> entirely trivial) project, and I wish you the best of luck in your work. I
> think this will be a
On 15/08/2019 20:15, Jim Ingham wrote:
Thanks for your great comments. A few replies...
On Aug 15, 2019, at 10:10 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
wrote:
I am wondering whether we really need to involve the memory allocation
functions here. What's the size of this address structure? I would ex
> On Aug 15, 2019, at 11:55 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
>
> On 15/08/2019 20:15, Jim Ingham wrote:
>> Thanks for your great comments. A few replies...
>>> On Aug 15, 2019, at 10:10 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
>>> wrote:
>>> I am wondering whether we really need to involve the memory allocation
I built Clang (and LLVM) in Release Mode with Debug Info (-O2),
and got these results:
| Dwarf Occurences |Occurences |
|--|-|
| DW\_OP\_deref|1,570|
| DW\_OP\_const|3,791|
| DW\_OP\_addr |9,528
