Thanks for the replies. I was hoping to get more positive feedback for
this, so given the current mixed-feelings replies, I think I'll just
give up on this idea, unless a more vocal supporter appears (probably
not the best idea to send this out just before the easter holidays).
In the mean tim
I'd have no objection to individual .cpp files having a few using
declarations for the specific types that file cares about:
...
#include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h"
...
using llvm::ArrayRef;
using llvm::Optional;
And then the rest of the file use
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019, at 7:31 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev wrote:
> Out of interest, I took a look at what lld is doing. I've found that
> while it doesn't have a LLVM.h equivalent, it is a heavy user of "using
> namespace llvm" (about 2 out of 3 cpp files have it).
LLD has include/lld/Common/
On 18/04/2019 20:03, Robbert Haarman via lldb-dev wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019, at 7:31 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev wrote:
Out of interest, I took a look at what lld is doing. I've found that
while it doesn't have a LLVM.h equivalent, it is a heavy user of "using
namespace llvm" (about 2 out o
