I'd like to get some more perspectives on the role of the VirtualFileSystem
abstraction in llvm/Support.
(The VFS layer has recently moved from Clang to LLVM, so crossposting to
both lists)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54277 proposed adding a function to
VirtualFileSystem to get the underlying "real
HI Sam,
Thanks again for taking the time to discuss this.
> On Nov 15, 2018, at 3:02 AM, Sam McCall wrote:
>
> I'd like to get some more perspectives on the role of the VirtualFileSystem
> abstraction in llvm/Support.
> (The VFS layer has recently moved from Clang to LLVM, so crossposting to
> On Nov 15, 2018, at 3:34 AM, Whisperity wrote:
>
> I am really not sure if adding real file system functionality strictly into
> the VFS is a good approach. This "ExternalFileSystem" thing sounds weird to
> me.
The `ExternalFileSystem` was an attempt to provide a more limited interface
wh
Hi Alex, hi Pavel
Thanks for your feedback and sorry for the late reply, I was a little busy on
the other sites.
Ok, so making the LLDB_FRAMEWORK_INSTALL_DIR vs. LLDB_FRAMEWORK_BUILD_DIR
distinction and changing the approach for tools from symlink to copy sound like
good tasks to start with.
