[lldb-dev] LLVM 6.0.0 Release

2018-03-08 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
I am pleased to announce that LLVM 6 is now available. Get it here: https://llvm.org/releases/download.html#6.0.0 This release is the result of the community's work over the past six months, including: retpoline Spectre variant 2 mitigation, significantly improved CodeView debug info for Windows,

[lldb-dev] [Bug 36630] LLDB SB API headers not installed anymore since r309021

2018-03-08 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36630 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |lab...@google.com Status|NEW

[lldb-dev] increase timeout for tests?

2018-03-08 Thread Davide Italiano via lldb-dev
Hi, I've noticed some of the tests we have trigger timeouts when running in debug. TIMEOUT: test_NSError_p_dwarf (lang/objc/foundation/TestObjCMethods2.py) TIMEOUT: test_expression_lookups_objc_dwarf (lang/objc/foundation/TestObjCMethods.py) TIMEOUT: test_expressions_in_literals_dsym (lang/objc/ob

Re: [lldb-dev] increase timeout for tests?

2018-03-08 Thread Greg Clayton via lldb-dev
It would be great to look into these and see what is taking so long. Some tests are doing way too much work and should be split up. But it would be great to see if we have any tests that are not good tests and are just taking too much time for no reason (like the watchpoint tests were that Pavel

Re: [lldb-dev] increase timeout for tests?

2018-03-08 Thread Davide Italiano via lldb-dev
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Greg Clayton wrote: > It would be great to look into these and see what is taking so long. Some > tests are doing way too much work and should be split up. But it would be > great to see if we have any tests that are not good tests and are just taking > too much