Re: [lldb-dev] Accessing DWARF information from C++

Hi Greg, thanks for your reply. I am developing a dynamic software updating tool for dynamically linked C libraries (in short: I want to patch dynamic libraries in-memory). My goal is to achieve that without any code instrumentation. The main problem is the state transformation between the o

Re: [lldb-dev] FW: LLDB: Unwinding based on Assembly Instruction Profiling

Hi Jason Thanks a lot for the detailed information. I am sorry to post my queries a bit late. Here are few things that I want to ask. When eh_frame has epilogue description as well, the Assembly profiler doesn't need to augment it. In this case, is eh_frame augmented unwind plan used as Non Call

[lldb-dev] [Bug 23560] lldb does not understand gcc-4.9 function prologues

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23560 abhiinnit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abhiinnit...@gmail.com Assign

[lldb-dev] [Bug 23139] Some tests fail with gcc-4.9.2 on Linux

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23139 abhiinnit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abhiinnit...@gmail.com Assign

[lldb-dev] [Bug 23139] Some tests fail with gcc-4.9.2 on Linux

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23139 abhiinnit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org -- You are rec

[lldb-dev] [Bug 23560] lldb does not understand gcc-4.9 function prologues

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23560 abhiinnit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org -- You are rec

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB: Unwinding based on Assembly Instruction Profiling

Hi Abhishek, > On Oct 30, 2015, at 6:56 AM, Abhishek Aggarwal wrote: > > When eh_frame has epilogue description as well, the Assembly profiler > doesn't need to augment it. In this case, is eh_frame augmented unwind > plan used as Non Call Site Unwind Plan or Assembly based Unwind Plan > is use