On 08/10/2021 11:06, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev wrote:
On 06/10/2021 14:59, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 14:32 +0200, Pavel Labath wrote:
Let me try to make a counterproposal.
Since the serial parameters are a property of a specific connection, and
one could theoretically have be d
On 06/10/2021 14:59, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 14:32 +0200, Pavel Labath wrote:
Let me try to make a counterproposal.
Since the serial parameters are a property of a specific connection, and
one could theoretically have be debugging multiple processes with
different connection p
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 14:32 +0200, Pavel Labath wrote:
> Thanks for the nice summary Michał. I've found it very helpful.
>
> The thing I am missing from this proposal is how would those settings
> translate into actual termios calls? Like, who would be responsible
> reading those settings and ac
Thanks for the nice summary Michał. I've found it very helpful.
The thing I am missing from this proposal is how would those settings
translate into actual termios calls? Like, who would be responsible
reading those settings and acting on them? Currently we have some tty
code in ConnectionFile
This looks pretty sensible. I spent a lot of time fighting serial ports on
early PCs and Apple IIs back in the eighties, and you seem to be covering most
of the usual problems. You should probably:
Make hardware flow control compulsory, since software flow control will not be
practical, and wit