Thanks! In the spirit of not letting users fix our bugs, I just made a draft
patch for the logging enable/disable: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103376
I don't think landing code is much of a burden, but I think you can just
re-request commit access if you had it before.
Cheers,
- Raphael
> On 30
\On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 10:57 PM Raphael Isemann
wrote:
> And I think the best way to propose a new API is maybe just making a
> dummy patch that adds the API + documentation (doesn't need an actual
> implementation or tests). And if everyone agrees the new API is fine
> you can add the tests an
I think patches are always welcome and I don't see any problems with
the proposed new API (haven't really checked though if they are all
unavailable* through the SB API). The only downside to extending the
SB API is that we have to maintain it forever. So if we add an API
then it should be abstract
