-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21.10.2015 12:47, Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-dev wrote:
> On 08.10.2015 12:21, Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-dev wrote:
>> On 05.10.2015 21:46, Todd Fiala wrote:
>>> Seems like a great idea. (Ed, is that something you might be
>>> able to review?)
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08.10.2015 12:21, Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-dev wrote:
> On 05.10.2015 21:46, Todd Fiala wrote:
>> Seems like a great idea. (Ed, is that something you might be
>> able to review?)
>
>
> The first patch is already proposed:
> http://reviews.llv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05.10.2015 21:46, Todd Fiala wrote:
> Seems like a great idea. (Ed, is that something you might be able
> to review?)
>
The first patch is already proposed:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13334
> Hopefully you have access to other platforms to test
That is just fine, you will need to submit patches prior to checking stuff in
so the other FreeBSD and Linux folks can try things out to make sure things
don't break on other platforms. If things diverge a lot, we might have a base
pthread debugging class that can be subclassed so that FreeBSD c
Seems like a great idea. (Ed, is that something you might be able to
review?)
Hopefully you have access to other platforms to test if it's breaking
anything? (Most likely candidates would be FreeBSD and Linux/Android, I'd
suspect, depending on how much you're having to change things).
On Wed, S
