Re: [lldb-dev] ELF header does not hold big modules

2017-02-02 Thread Eugene Birukov via lldb-dev
: [lldb-dev] ELF header does not hold big modules Found this on the web: e_shnum This member holds the number of entries in the section header table. Thus the product of e_shentsize and e_shnum gives the section header table's size in bytes. If a file has no section header ta

Re: [lldb-dev] ELF header does not hold big modules

2017-02-02 Thread Greg Clayton via lldb-dev
Found this on the web: e_shnum This member holds the number of entries in the section header table. Thus the product of e_shentsize and e_shnum gives the section header table's size in bytes. If a file has no section header table, e_shnum holds the value zero. If the number of

Re: [lldb-dev] ELF header does not hold big modules

2017-01-23 Thread Eugene Birukov via lldb-dev
> By "all" I presume you mean "all fields that refer to section counts or > indexes". Correct. I mean exactly 3 fields: e_phnum, e_shnum, and e_shstrndx that could be redirected to section #0. Sent from Outlook From: Pavel Labath S

Re: [lldb-dev] ELF header does not hold big modules

2017-01-23 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
Hello Eugene, On 21 January 2017 at 00:42, Eugene Birukov wrote: > Hello, > > > I have a core dump that LLDB cannot open because it contains more than 64K > sections. The "readelf" utility gives me the output in the end of this > message. It seems that the actual number of program headers and the