I'll dig in more when I get to it, but yeah I like the concept for sure.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Zachary Turner wrote:
> Ahh, that's a bummer if true. Because `contrib` is a nice way to group
> together all the things that all the things that have specific maintainers
> and so everyone
Ahh, that's a bummer if true. Because `contrib` is a nice way to group
together all the things that all the things that have specific maintainers
and so everyone else is allowed to break.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:04 AM Todd Fiala wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Todd Fiala wrote:
>
>>
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Todd Fiala wrote:
> Hi Zachary,
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Zachary Turner
> wrote:
>
>> Has the xcode build been changed to use static bindings yet?
>>
>
> It is only in our downstream branches. I stripped out support in llvm.org
> lldb per our other th
Hi Zachary,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Zachary Turner wrote:
> Has the xcode build been changed to use static bindings yet?
>
It is only in our downstream branches. I stripped out support in llvm.org
lldb per our other threads.
> I got to thinking that maybe it would make sense to pu
Has the xcode build been changed to use static bindings yet? I got to
thinking that maybe it would make sense to put them alongside the xcode
workspace folders, just to emphasize that the static bindings were an
artifact of how the xcode build works. This way we just say "Xcode build
uses static
