The breakpoint hit count is not increasing, which makes it look like we aren’t
managing to do the job of stepping past the breakpoint. That requires
restoring the breakpoint instruction, setting the processor to single-step,
running just the thread that hit the breakpoint, then reinserting the
2017-11-18 3:49 GMT+08:00 Jim Ingham :
> Negative breakpoint ID’s are used for breakpoints lldb sets for internal
> purposes. You can see the internal breakpoints with the “break list -i”
> command.
>
> “continue” doesn’t usually need to set internal breakpoints, however. And
> we don’t usually t
Negative breakpoint ID’s are used for breakpoints lldb sets for internal
purposes. You can see the internal breakpoints with the “break list -i” command.
“continue” doesn’t usually need to set internal breakpoints, however. And we
don’t usually tell you about internal breakpoint hits, especiall
Dear all,
I have just debug KLEE with lldb. A breakpoint was set on the function
"executeAllocUnbounded". After the breakpoint was hiited, I used "continue"
to let the program to go on. However, it did not work. The respose from
lldb is following:
(lldb)
Process 10254 stopped
* thread #1, nam
