I'd prefer to avoid calling the unittest2 functions. We already do that in
a couple places, but if we could centralize on one place where we call
unittest2 decorators it would really make it easier to customize our own
decorators. For example, I have a short-term goal of adding an option to
dotes
That could be a reasonable way to do it. Now that I think about it,
unittest2 already gives us a generic skip where we can put the logic in
that we want. Not sure why that didn't occur to me earlier as I've done
that very thing in the past. (I think I've conditioned myself to use our
custom decor
I think recently we are trying to reduce the number of decorators we are
having so adding a few new Ubuntu specific decorators might not be a good
idea. My suggestion would be to move on a little bit to the functional
programming style with adding a new option to @expetedFailureAll where we
can spe
Hey all,
What do you think about having some kind of way of marking the (in this
case, specifically) Ubuntu distribution for fail/skip test decorators?
I've had a few cases where I've needed to mark tests failing on for Ubuntu
where it really was only a particular release of an Ubuntu distribution
