IIUC Linux doesn't include the system libraries in the core files, makes them
much smaller, but also makes reconstructing them a bit more work.
Jim
> On May 8, 2017, at 11:34 AM, John Lindal via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> I regularly load core files on OSX, and it seems to work fine. Is Linux
>
I regularly load core files on OSX, and it seems to work fine. Is Linux
dramatically different?
John
> On May 5, 2017, at 2:43 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Core file debugging is not that well supported right now. I have made
> a couple of fixes from time to time, mainly becau
Core file debugging is not that well supported right now. I have made
a couple of fixes from time to time, mainly because I see it as a
possibility for testing other parts of the debugger, but I don't think
it get's much use and testing (on linux anyway).
I *think* you might be able to get it work
Before I dive into the code to see if there's a bug, I wanted to see if I
was just doing it wrong.
I have an application with a different libc, etc than the machine I'm
running the debugger on. The application also has a bunch of libraries
that simply don't exist in the normal location on my dev
