On 16/03/2021 00:37, Ed Maste via lldb-dev wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 16:00, Ed Maste wrote:
A brief note on the FreeBSD mips support - the FreeBSD Foundation is
sponsoring Michał to do this work, but our primary non-x86 focus is
amd64.
Oops, that doesn't make a lot of sense. I meant arm6
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 16:00, Ed Maste wrote:
>
> A brief note on the FreeBSD mips support - the FreeBSD Foundation is
> sponsoring Michał to do this work, but our primary non-x86 focus is
> amd64.
Oops, that doesn't make a lot of sense. I meant arm64 (AArch64) here.
Thanks to a couple of folks w
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 03:24, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
wrote:
>
> So, unless someone willing to address these issues (I'm happy to provide
> support where I can), I propose we drop mips support. Generic mips
> support will remain (and hopefully be better tested) thanks to the
> FreeBSD mips port,
Sounds very reasonable to me.
thanks for bringing this up!
-- adrian
> On Mar 9, 2021, at 12:24 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I propose to remove support for linux mips debugging. This basically amounts
> to deleting
> source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeRegisterCont
+1
This all sounds in line with the expectations we've laid out on the mailing
list in the past for platform/language support.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:24 AM Pavel Labath via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I propose to remove support for linux mips debugging. This basi
Hi all,
I propose to remove support for linux mips debugging. This basically
amounts to deleting
source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeRegisterContextLinux_mips64.{cpp,h}.
My reasons for doing that are:
- This code is unmaintained (last non-mechanical change was in 2017) and
untested (no publi
