On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, Jonas Devlieghere wrote:
Yes, that's correct. This was added in edadb818e5b.
Thanks!
// Martin
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 2:46 PM Adrian Prantl wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 6, 2020, at 11:17 AM, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I just wanted to let you know that most of the work is complete for
> > auto-detecting optional dependencies in LLDB. Unless explicit
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 11:17 AM, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I just wanted to let you know that most of the work is complete for
> auto-detecting optional dependencies in LLDB. Unless explicitly
> specified, optional dependencies like editline will be enabled w
Yes, that's correct. This was added in edadb818e5b.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:19 PM Martin Storsjö wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, Jonas Devlieghere wrote:
>
> > After trying it out I concluded that it should be easy enough to check
> > for the static bindings flag in FindPythonInterpAndLibs.cmake
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, Jonas Devlieghere wrote:
After trying it out I concluded that it should be easy enough to check
for the static bindings flag in FindPythonInterpAndLibs.cmake so I've
implemented your suggestion in fc6f15d4d2c. Thanks again for bringing
this up.
Awesome, thanks!
Do I unders
After trying it out I concluded that it should be easy enough to check
for the static bindings flag in FindPythonInterpAndLibs.cmake so I've
implemented your suggestion in fc6f15d4d2c. Thanks again for bringing
this up.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:01 PM Jonas Devlieghere wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 20
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 12:52 PM Martin Storsjö wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev wrote:
>
> > I just wanted to let you know that most of the work is complete for
> > auto-detecting optional dependencies in LLDB. Unless explicitly
> > specified, optional dependencies lik
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev wrote:
I just wanted to let you know that most of the work is complete for
auto-detecting optional dependencies in LLDB. Unless explicitly
specified, optional dependencies like editline will be enabled when
available and disabled otherwise. This
Hey everyone,
I just wanted to let you know that most of the work is complete for
auto-detecting optional dependencies in LLDB. Unless explicitly
specified, optional dependencies like editline will be enabled when
available and disabled otherwise. This is different from the old
behavior, where op
