Thanks a lot for spearheading this and seeing it move forward. It's
absolutely appreciated.
Thank you.
-eric
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:23 PM Chandler Carruth via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> As mentioned some time ago[1], we’ve had a long (looong) series of
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:18 PM C Bergström
wrote:
> So discussion has been beaten to death and based on your comments - it
> seems you anticipate strong support.
>
I think there has been explicit strong support on the threads.
> Is any (in)formal vote planned? Will this just get enacted, "wh
So discussion has been beaten to death and based on your comments - it
seems you anticipate strong support. Is any (in)formal vote planned? Will
this just get enacted, "who" decided..
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:55 AM, Chandler Carruth via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
Hello folks,
As mentioned some time ago[1], we’ve had a long (looong) series of
discussions about establishing a code-of-conduct for the LLVM project as a
whole over on the llvm-dev thread and the http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741
code review.
The discussion has largely died down for some time,
