org] On Behalf Of Greg
> Clayton via lldb-dev
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 3:57 PM
> To: Tyro Software
> Cc: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
> Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Discrete code and data memories
>
> I believe that some of the DSPs we have support for (Hexagon?) has this
>
May 25, 2016 3:57 PM
To: Tyro Software
Cc: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Discrete code and data memories
I believe that some of the DSPs we have support for (Hexagon?) has this kind of
issue. I would speak to Ted Woodward and see if they do anything special for
this.
Greg Clayton
I believe that some of the DSPs we have support for (Hexagon?) has this kind of
issue. I would speak to Ted Woodward and see if they do anything special for
this.
Greg Clayton
> On May 25, 2016, at 2:16 AM, Tyro Software via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to implement LLDB support for an a
I'm trying to implement LLDB support for an architecture where code and
data stores can be explicitly separated and can even have overlapping
addresses (one can think of it as ROM and RAM, with separate access buses).
My impression is that LLDB somewhat presumes a hybrid memory map, e.g. the
clien
