I look forward to seeing DWARF5 support integrated into LLDB. No problems that
I know of that you will run into. Please include me in on the LLDB related
patches for DWARF5. One particular area of interest is the emission of the new
accelerator tables and having LLDB support them. I believe the
...@google.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 3:55 AM
To: Robinson, Paul
Cc: LLDB Dev (lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org); Tamas Berghammer
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] DWARF v5 unit headers
Thanks for the heads up Paul. I've tried your change on linux, and I don't see
any regressions, so it should
Thanks for the heads up Paul. I've tried your change on linux, and I don't
see any regressions, so it should be safe to land.
Regarding the test failures you were seeing: what is the system you were
testing this on? If it is linux, could you send me the list of failures --
I'd be interested in get
As far as I know the only dwarf v5 functionality currently implemented in
LLDB is the split dwarf support so I don't expect it to work with the new
dwarf v5 data but as long as clang emits dwarf v4 (or older) by default it
shouldn't cause any immediate problem with the test suite (we will still
hav
I'm planning to commit a patch (http://reviews.llvm.org/D30206) which will
cause Clang/LLVM to emit correct unit headers if you ask for version 5.
I've run the lldb tests and I *think* I pointed to my modified Clang
correctly (cmake with -DLLDB_TEST_COMPILER=/my/clang) and AFAICT it does
not introd
