Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week

On 10/16/2019 05:51 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:46 PM Tom Stellard > wrote: > > On 10/16/2019 07:23 AM, Robinson, Paul wrote: > > +1. And put it in the email (subject?). While it’s possible to derive > a count from a hash manuall

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week

On 10/16/2019 07:23 AM, Robinson, Paul wrote: > +1. And put it in the email (subject?). While it’s possible to derive a > count from a hash manually, better to have it in the email in the first > place. You can’t rely on order-of-email-delivery to reflect order-of-commit. > I spent some time

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week

+1. And put it in the email (subject?). While it’s possible to derive a count from a hash manually, better to have it in the email in the first place. You can’t rely on order-of-email-delivery to reflect order-of-commit. --paulr From: llvm-dev On Behalf Of Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev Sent: W

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week

On 10/15/2019 09:44 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:33 PM Tom Stellard > wrote: > > On 10/15/2019 09:24 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: > > Hi Tom. > > > > One issue with this is that we don't have a clear "ordering" from > linear revis

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week

On 10/15/2019 09:24 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: > Hi Tom. > > One issue with this is that we don't have a clear "ordering" from linear > revision numbers from these emails. Have we looked into continuing to > generate our own emails per commits instead so that we control the format? > This actually