Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-03 Thread NAKAMURA Takumi via lldb-dev
"git-describe -t" works also for lw tags. 2016年7月4日(月) 2:48 Jared Grubb via cfe-dev : > > El jun. 30, 2016, a las 19:31, Matthias Braun via cfe-dev < > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> escribió: > > > On Jun 30, 2016, at 4:14 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev < > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 30 Ju

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-03 Thread Jared Grubb via lldb-dev
> El jun. 30, 2016, a las 19:31, Matthias Braun via cfe-dev > escribió: > > >> On Jun 30, 2016, at 4:14 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev >> mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> >> On 30 Jun 2016 10:20 p.m., "Robinson, Paul" > > wrote: >> > We've since st

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-01 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
On 1 July 2016 at 17:32, Tim Northover wrote: > My issue with using tags like this is that they pollute the tag > namespace and will quickly swamp what I consider to be the important > ones ("release-X"). OK, so we've got "git tag -l 'release*'" but > that's pretty ugly. What if we had a mixed mo

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-01 Thread Tim Northover via lldb-dev
On 1 July 2016 at 08:18, Tom Honermann via lldb-dev wrote: > On 6/30/2016 5:20 PM, Robinson, Paul via cfe-dev wrote: > We're using tags in this manner for our internal repos and LLVM/Clang > mirrors and haven't experienced any problems. We're at ~50k tags for > our most used repo, so not quite at

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-01 Thread Tom Honermann via lldb-dev
On 6/30/2016 6:18 PM, Jim Rowan via cfe-dev wrote: > > On Jun 30, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev > mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > (talking about lots of tags) > >> I don't know that it really scales well when you >> are talking about (long term) hundreds of thousands of

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-07-01 Thread Tom Honermann via lldb-dev
On 6/30/2016 5:20 PM, Robinson, Paul via cfe-dev wrote: > We were using tags for a while in our own SVN->git conversion internally. > (git branch is pushed to SVN and the SVN r-number used to create a tag.) > They are convenient for some things, but each tag adds a new (if small) > file to .git/tag

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-06-30 Thread Robinson, Paul via lldb-dev
From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.go...@linaro.org] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 4:15 PM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: Clang Dev; LLDB Dev; LLVM Dev; Reid Kleckner; llvm-foundat...@lists.llvm.org Subject: RE: [cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook On 30 Jun 2016 10:20 p.m., "Robinson

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-06-30 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
On 30 Jun 2016 10:20 p.m., "Robinson, Paul" wrote: > We've since stopped creating the tags, and gotten used to not having > them. We do the 'rev-list --count' trick which mainly gets recorded as > one component of the version number, and it has been working for us. Does that work for sub modules

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook

2016-06-30 Thread Robinson, Paul via lldb-dev
> -Original Message- > From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Renato > Golin via cfe-dev > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:49 AM > To: Reid Kleckner > Cc: LLVM Dev; llvm-foundat...@lists.llvm.org; Clang Dev; LLDB Dev > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] [llvm-de