Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-27 Thread Xinliang David Li via lldb-dev
Stable release can use a different numbering space -- a,b,c,d. 4.1a means the first patch release of 4.1 release, etc. David On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev > wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:01 AM X

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-26 Thread Xinliang David Li via lldb-dev
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:01 AM Xinliang David Li via cfe-dev < > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I also believe this is the simplest versioning scheme*. It eliminates all >> future debates on this topic (e.g, when to bump major vers

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-26 Thread Xinliang David Li via lldb-dev
I also believe this is the simplest versioning scheme*. It eliminates all future debates on this topic (e.g, when to bump major version etc) and solves the problem once and for all -- which is another plus :) *) similar suggestions a) start from 4, increase by 1; b) start from 40, increase by 1.