Re: [lldb-dev] Some API test failures are really opaque/could be improved

I believe the issue is probably not related so much to LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS vs LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES, but rather to the fact that LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES uses per-target runtime directories now (hasn't always been the case), which basically means that libc++ ends up in `/lib//libc++.so` instead of

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] 12.0.0-rc1 Release has been tagged

> On Feb 13, 2021, at 12:04, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 28 Jan 2021, at 05:05, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev > wrote: >> >> I've tagged the 12.0.0-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload >> binaries. > > During 12.0.0-rc1 test builds on FreeBSD, I encountered this unittest > fai

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [11.0.0 Release] The release branch is here; trunk is now 12.0.0

Thanks! I've just pushed the commit and will iterate on it until everyone is upgraded. Happy to finally get this started! Louis > On Jul 16, 2020, at 10:34, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > Sounds good to me. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:25 PM Louis Dionne wrote: >> >> Thanks for tagging, Hans. Ca

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [11.0.0 Release] The release branch is here; trunk is now 12.0.0

Thanks for tagging, Hans. Can I go ahead with the CMake version bump advertised in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-June/142893.html? This may cause some instability on a few builders that have not upgraded to a recent CMake yet, but I'll iterate as explained in the linked thread. L