On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:59 PM Tom Stellard via Openmp-dev
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm splitting this discussion off of my RFC for release process
> changes.
>
> We currently have no official release qualification criteria. In
> other words, we don't have any blocking tests that need to pass in
> ord
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:59 PM Tom Stellard via Openmp-dev
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The
> current process is documented here:
> https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html
>
> There are two parts to this proposal. The first is a lis
On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 18:22 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and
> uploading
> binaries.
>
> If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about
> a month
> to get your fix in.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46045
Bug ID: 46045
Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -O1
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priori
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46046
Bug ID: 46046
Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -O1
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: enhancement
P
