Attempt at a fix: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76650
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 5:22 PM Lutz Justen via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Sorry, the link was internal. Here's the proper on:
>
> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/lldb/blob/master/source/Core/FormatEntity.cpp#L861
>
>
> On Mon, Ma
Hi Walter,
lldb-instr needs compile_commands.json file to figure out the exact
compiler invocation for every file. Can you verify that the file exists in
the directory you're running lldb-instr from?
Cheers,
Jonas
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:29 PM Walter via lldb-dev
wrote:
> Hi, I've recently t
Hi, I've recently tried to use lldb-instr, as mentioned in
https://lldb.llvm.org/resources/sbapi.html, but I'm having the following
issue when running it on darwin.
./lldb-instr
> LLVM ERROR: Unable to find target for this triple (no targets are
registered)
Is this a known issue? Or should lldb-i
Dear everyone,
I had hoped rc5 would be the last one, but we needed to pick up yet another fix.
Release candidate 6 was tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6 on the
release/10.x branch at d32170dbd5b. It picks up the fix for
https://llvm.org/pr45270
Source code and docs are available at
https://prereleas
Sorry, the link was internal. Here's the proper on:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/lldb/blob/master/source/Core/FormatEntity.cpp#L861
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Lutz Justen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> We've noticed that LLDB sometimes escapes certain characters (e.g. in the
> +128/negative range) of
Hey,
We've noticed that LLDB sometimes escapes certain characters (e.g. in the
+128/negative range) of const char* strings and sometimes it doesn't. In
particular, this happens for unicode strings:
C++:
const char* str = u8"😂";
LLDB:
(lldb) expr str
(const char *) $0 = 0x7ff662489d18 "😂"
I think it's too late for this, but distributions that install the
tool like that may want to take that patch downstream.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 9:55 AM James Henderson
wrote:
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> I don't know if you'll be planning on RC6, but this bug:
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45271
Hi Hans,
I don't know if you'll be planning on RC6, but this bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45271 was just filed as a regression
in LLVM 10 versus LLVM 9, and looks like it could break things (potentially
silently) for at least some installations of llvm-strip. There's a fix
that's ba