Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC]The future of pexpect

> On Feb 25, 2019, at 2:21 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:57 PM Adrian Prantl wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Feb 25, 2019, at 1:40 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:35 PM Adrian Prantl wrote: > On Feb 25, 2019, at 1:15 PM

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC]The future of pexpect

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:57 PM Adrian Prantl wrote: > > > > > On Feb 25, 2019, at 1:40 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:35 PM Adrian Prantl wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Feb 25, 2019, at 1:15 PM, Davide Italiano > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:3

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC]The future of pexpect

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:35 PM Adrian Prantl wrote: > > > > > On Feb 25, 2019, at 1:15 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:32 AM Pavel Labath wrote: > >> > >> On 21/02/2019 19:48, Ted Woodward wrote: > >>> > >>> > -Original Message- > From: lldb-dev O

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC]The future of pexpect

> On Feb 25, 2019, at 1:40 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:35 PM Adrian Prantl wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Feb 25, 2019, at 1:15 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:32 AM Pavel Labath wrote: On 21/02/2019 19:48, Ted Woodward wrote:

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC]The future of pexpect

> On Feb 25, 2019, at 1:15 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:32 AM Pavel Labath wrote: >> >> On 21/02/2019 19:48, Ted Woodward wrote: >>> >>> -Original Message- From: lldb-dev On Behalf Of Pavel Labath via lldb-dev Sent: Thursday, February

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC]The future of pexpect

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:32 AM Pavel Labath wrote: > > On 21/02/2019 19:48, Ted Woodward wrote: > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: lldb-dev On Behalf Of Pavel Labath > >> via lldb-dev > >> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 8:35 AM > >> To: Davide Italiano > >> Cc: LLDB > >> Sub

[lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

Hi all, We've got some internal efforts in progress, and one of those would benefit from debug info parsing being out of process (independently of whether or not the rest of LLDB is out of process). There's a couple of advantages to this, which I'll enumerate here: - It improves one source of

Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

This is ThreadList::GetSelectedThread, it calls OperatingSystemPython::UpdateThreadList indirectly. However, I cannot reproduce the error Alexander gets, due to a deadlock. -Original Message- From: jing...@apple.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 2:14 AM To: Tatyana Krasnukha Cc: Ale