[lldb-dev] [Bug 40668] `ninja` does not rebuild if sources change

2019-02-08 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40668 Davide Italiano changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 40669] cannot pass SIGSEGV / EXC_BAD_ACCESS on OSX

2019-02-08 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40669 Jim Ingham changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[lldb-dev] [Bug 40669] New: cannot pass SIGSEGV / EXC_BAD_ACCESS on OSX

2019-02-08 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40669 Bug ID: 40669 Summary: cannot pass SIGSEGV / EXC_BAD_ACCESS on OSX Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: Macintosh OS: MacOS X Status: NEW Severity: norma

[lldb-dev] [Bug 40668] New: `ninja` does not rebuild if sources change

2019-02-08 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40668 Bug ID: 40668 Summary: `ninja` does not rebuild if sources change Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: Macintosh OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 7.1.0 release - Please test the branch

2019-02-08 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
On 02/06/2019 10:57 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 14:09 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: >> On 02/05/2019 10:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 16:13 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: On 02/05/2019 11:32 AM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > On 02/05/2019 11:

[lldb-dev] Odd intermittent test error

2019-02-08 Thread Ted Woodward via lldb-dev
Does anyone know what causes this? I see it on our bots intermittently, but haven't been able to reproduce it locally. The test passes, but something unnamed crashes, and the test is marked as failed. TEST 'lldb-Suite :: functionalities/data-formatter/synthcapping/TestSyn

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Unwinding + Symbol Files: How To?

2019-02-08 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
Hello Jason, Greg, thank you for the feedback. Please find my responses inline. On 08/02/2019 04:06, Jason Molenda wrote: Hi Pavel, I'm open to this.  I don't think there was any specific reason why UnwindTable is in the ObjectFile over the Module - it was very likely not an intentional cho