Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 7.1.0 release - Please test the branch

2019-02-06 Thread Michał Górny via lldb-dev
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 14:09 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 02/05/2019 10:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 16:13 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > On 02/05/2019 11:32 AM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > > > On 02/05/2019 11:26 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Tue,

Re: [lldb-dev] Object identities in the LLDB's C++ API

2019-02-06 Thread Greg Clayton via lldb-dev
> On Feb 6, 2019, at 2:11 PM, Joshua Peraza wrote: > > Adding a hashes where we need them SGTM. > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:31 AM Greg Clayton > wrote: > If it is inside the object itself, and we have only 1 user data "void *" per > object, I can see many clients

Re: [lldb-dev] Object identities in the LLDB's C++ API

2019-02-06 Thread Joshua Peraza via lldb-dev
Adding a hashes where we need them SGTM. On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:31 AM Greg Clayton wrote: > If it is inside the object itself, and we have only 1 user data "void *" > per object, I can see many clients wanting to use this user data. > This surprised me though. There are situations where mult

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 7.1.0 release - Please test the branch

2019-02-06 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
On 02/05/2019 10:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 16:13 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: >> On 02/05/2019 11:32 AM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: >>> On 02/05/2019 11:26 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 11:23 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 02/05/2019 08: