https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38312
Raphael Isemann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||teempe...@gmail.com
Assignee|lldb-d
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38317
Bug ID: 38317
Summary: Address breakpoints don't work if set before the
process launches
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Hi Jim,
I found a breakpoint problem. Setting a breakpoint by address doesn't work
if the process isn't running. I traced it back to r322348, "Fix
Breakpoint::RemoveInvalidLocations to fix the exec testcase.", from January
11.
With ToT from a few days ago on x86_64 Linux, I get the address of mai
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38312
Bug ID: 38312
Summary: two errors from unrecognized command
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Hi Pavel, thanks for your feedback!
> I would propose to create a new class (RichMangingInfo?), which would
> wrap both ItaniumPartialDemangler and the existing string-chopping
> implementation, and provide a unified interface on top of them.
Right, good point. Adding an abstraction like this cert
Hello Stefan,
thank you for working on this. I believe this work will bring a huge
improvement to LLDB.
Adding something like DemangleWithRichNameIndexInfo to the Mangled
class makes sense to me. However, I don't think that function should
be taking an ItaniumPartialDemangler as an argument. The
Hello everyone,
Here's just a quick reminder that the upcoming release branch is
scheduled for creation one week from today, on Wednesday 1 August
2018.
Please try to avoid disruptive changes close to the branch.
The full release schedule is available under Upcoming Releases at
https://llvm.org/
