You need to send some sort of continue through the GDB remote interface. The
only way to get a $T packet back is in response to a "?" packet or to a "vCont"
or other continue or step packet.
> On Aug 22, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Vadim Chugunov wrote:
>
> It does send '$T05...' in response, but it loo
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 22.08.2017 01:36, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> According to the release schedule, we're supposed to be tagging
>> 'final' on Wednesday. Unfortunately, I suspect we will be a little
>> late.
>>
>> There are
It does send '$T05...' in response, but it looks like lldb does not analyze
responses to manually sent packets.
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Greg Clayton wrote:
> If you do a reverse step it actually should send a process resumed and a
> process stopped event.
>
> > On Aug 18, 2017, at 7:19
On 22.08.2017 01:36, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> According to the release schedule, we're supposed to be tagging
> 'final' on Wednesday. Unfortunately, I suspect we will be a little
> late.
>
> There are currently 32 open release blockers:
> https://bugs.llvm.org/bugli
> On Aug 21, 2017, at 12:02 PM, karnajit wangkhem via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Below is a sample example, where target.source-map seems to have a
> limitation. The limitation seems to be because
> 1. lldb does not have an equivalent command like directory in gdb
The gdb "dir" comma
