On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:44 AM Matthias Braun via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> > On May 31, 2017, at 4:06 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
> >
> > Thank you all for the pointers. I am going to look at these to see if
> > there is anything that we could reuse, and come back. In the mean
Pavel, this is pretty much exactly what happens. (Except that there is
no frontend. The substitution is done during CodeGen. But that is just a
detail)
I think a more general solution, that doesn't tie mulle-objc implicitly
to the dwarf format would be better in the long term though.
Ciao
Na
On 31 May 2017 at 19:40, Jim Ingham wrote:
> Pavel, can you say more about your idea?
>
> In both ObjC and C++ methods, you can refer to an ivar either as "this->ivar"
> or just "ivar". But the DWARF for C++ doesn't tell lldb that a particular
> language supports referring to ivars transparentl
