On 25 Aug 2016, at 05:42, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> 3.9.0-rc3 was just tagged from the branch at r279704.
>
> This one is very similar to rc2. These are the only new commits:
>
> r279224 - Minor change to OpenCL release notes
> r279260 - [lld] Add a note that 3.9 is a major
Definitely agree we can't map everything to that model. I can imagine a
first step towards lit being where all our tests are literally exactly the
same as they are today, with Makefiles and all, but where lit is used
purely to recurse the directory tree, run things in multiple processes, and
spawn
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:40 PM Kate Stone via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> LLDB has come a long way since the project was first announced. As a
>> robust debugger for C-family
FWIW, I've taken a few whacks at getting Linux detected better over the
last few years, and haven't yet found a reliable way to detect it from
quite a few samples of cores from a number of different systems. We can
spend more time looking into it, but that stone has been turned over
several times.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=29138
Bug ID: 29138
Summary: lldb uses internal lib/Support/regex_impl.h LLVM
header
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
On 25 August 2016 at 04:42, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
wrote:
> Dear testers,
>
> 3.9.0-rc3 was just tagged from the branch at r279704.
ARM and AArch64 seem fine, binaries uploaded:
ARM sha1sum: d1bc90d475f8d764f1ff7524ba2f3e26acb8a463
AArch64 sha1sum: 5e4e3bdf747aa2ac50c588cea5d67f896376
