Nothing of this sort has been done to my knowledge, and I haven't heard of any
plans to do so either.
It should certainly be possible, you just need to grub the C stack and
recognize the pattern of a Python stack frame in it and where said frame
stashes away the arguments & locals, and then re-
Hello,
I've searched for information wether it is possible to debug a python script
using LLDB, and haven't found anything so far.
Specifically I'm interested in an LLDB counterpart to what GDB provides (the
two main pages being https://wiki.python.org/moin/DebuggingWithGdb and
http://fedorapr
> On 6 Jul 2016, at 16:16, Robinson, Paul wrote:
> >
> > As Daniel pointed out, an enumeration like that knows no bounds, and
> > starting a list invites endless what-if questions. That's why I settled
> > for a more qualitative statement; we have to acknowledge that ultimately
> > there's a judg
> -Original Message-
> From: Dr D. Chisnall [mailto:dc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of David
> Chisnall
> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 1:48 AM
> To: Renato Golin
> Cc: Robinson, Paul; Daniel Berlin; llvm-dev; openmp-dev (openmp-
> d...@lists.llvm.org); LLDB; cfe-...@lists.llvm.org; Ra
On 6 Jul 2016, at 16:16, Robinson, Paul wrote:
>
> As Daniel pointed out, an enumeration like that knows no bounds, and
> starting a list invites endless what-if questions. That's why I settled
> for a more qualitative statement; we have to acknowledge that ultimately
> there's a judgement call
I would like to submit two patches for code review.
They introduce concrete support for OCaml native debugging, granted that you
have access to the native compiler with DWARF emission support (see
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/574)
This adds about 2000 lines of code.
The type system isn't
Hello all,
I've been working on Rust bindings for the LLDB API and they're coming
along pretty well. They aren't complete yet, but they're getting close:
https://github.com/endoli/lldb.rs/
The documentation for these bindings can be found at
https://endoli.github.io/lldb.rs/
I need to write mor
On 4 Jul 2016, at 12:27, Renato Golin via Openmp-dev
wrote:
>
> On 4 July 2016 at 00:42, Robinson, Paul wrote:
>> Daniel claimed it was not different, even though he proposed the text.
>> I think it is better, as "egregious" (even though it is qualitative)
>> helps identify what "rare" circumst
