https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27182
Bug ID: 27182
Summary: TestCallWithTimeout.py failing on OS X
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: MacOS X
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
We also need to think about all other types of tracing. It might make more
sense to keep these calls on SBProcess and have the calls simply be:
lldb::SBTrace lldb::SBProcess::StartTrace(SBTraceOptions &trace_options,
lldb::SBError &error);
And you would need to specify which threads in the SBT
Hey,
I noticed that SBProcess::ReadCStringFromMemory uses the deprecated
Process::ReadCStringFromMemory function. The note says that it was
deprecated in favor of ReadStringFromMemory.
Is it possible to add that function to the SBProcess api ?
___
lldb-d
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27181
Todd Fiala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.or
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27181
Bug ID: 27181
Summary: Xcode gtests: ensure they run, not just build, on
Xcode target
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: MacOS X
Statu
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27180
Bug ID: 27180
Summary: test infra: OS X Green Dragon - switch to run tests
with just-built clang
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27180
Todd Fiala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.or
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27179
Todd Fiala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |todd.fi...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this ma
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27179
Bug ID: 27179
Summary: test infra: Green Dragon OS X builder is sometimes
accessing an unguarded missing dictionary key, xUnit
formatter
Product: lldb
Version: unspecifi
> It might be also possible to run an expression that will route
> stdin/stdout/stderr to /dev/null before detaching if we know that we have a
> master/slave pty hooked up the the inferior's in/out/err. We could run an
> expression like:
(At least on linux) you would also need something like:
io
I second Greg's suggestions, and I have some thoughts of my own:
- with the proposed API, it is not possible to get a trace for newly
created threads - the process needs to be stopped first, so you can
enable trace collection. There certainly are cases where this could be
problematic, e.g. if you
11 matches
Mail list logo