No response. I filed a bug, hopefully somebody will pay attention.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26322
From: mi...@microsoft.com
To: eugen...@hotmail.com; lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
Subject: RE: Problems with core load on Linux and proposed solution
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:37:45 +
Eugene, do you know if they have taken these changes? Have you heard from
anybody on lldb-dev?
mikem
From: Eugene Birukov [mailto:eugen...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 10:46 AM
To: LLDB
Subject: Problems with core load on Linux and proposed solution
Hi,
LLDB 3.8 has much bett
Uploaded Fedora and openSUSE binaries. Looking good.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Ben Pope via Release-testers <
release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 05:51 AM, Hans Wennborg via
> Release-testers wrote:
>
>> Dear testers,
>>
>> Release Candidate 3 has just
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 4:21 PM, Mike Gulick via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi lldb-dev,
>
> I'm trying to write some tooling to help with debugging complex builds on
> Mac. The libraries all have debugging info separated into .dSYM/
> directories. Due to some complexities in our build system, th
I updated my code and removed the call to AddListener and as I can
tell nothing changed. It is still behaving "strange". It also didn't
work with the python example. I couldn't step over the next
instruction, so I am getting similar behavior like the c++ code.
The strange thing is that at the firs
Thanks for the feedback, and sorry about the slow response.
After some internal discussions, it looks like we are not going to go
forward with this approach at the moment.
cheers,
pl
On 24 February 2016 at 11:16, Tamas Berghammer via lldb-dev
wrote:
> I completely agree with you that we shoul