[lldb-dev] [Bug 24764] New: Various C++ language features can't be debugged well on Windows

2015-09-09 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24764 Bug ID: 24764 Summary: Various C++ language features can't be debugged well on Windows Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT S

Re: [lldb-dev] top-of-tree build failure when using configure on Linux?

2015-09-09 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
The community's current plan of record is still to kill the autoconf build but there is no definitive timeline on when it will be complete. But to answer your question, yes it is across all projects. >From the LLDB side, I don't know if anyone depends on having a working autoconf build for produc

Re: [lldb-dev] top-of-tree build failure when using configure on Linux?

2015-09-09 Thread Rick Foos via lldb-dev
Can you change it to CMake instead of configure? I know that's not what you want to hear, but the configure build is on its way out, so you're going to have to do this at some point anyway. Zachary, is the decision to drop autoconf across all projects or just LLDB? The last time I proposed a cm

Re: [lldb-dev] top-of-tree build failure when using configure on Linux?

2015-09-09 Thread Ted Woodward via lldb-dev
I took a look at the buildbots; it looks like another buildbot is failing with the same issue – the debian bot, http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian-clang . It fails the compile at the same place as the Hexagon Ubuntu bot, and it also uses configure. Google has 2 Ubuntu 14.04

Re: [lldb-dev] Looking for info on two rdars: 18684124, 15367233

2015-09-09 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
We have a chunk of tests that are marked xfail that pass right now on OS X. I'll go through those in the near future. I'm also seeing several tests consistently unexpectedly pass on Linux x86_64 (Ubuntu 14.04) built with clang-3.6. I think at least some of them fail with gcc-4.9, so they might n

Re: [lldb-dev] Looking for info on two rdars: 18684124, 15367233

2015-09-09 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
On 9 September 2015 at 14:21, Ed Maste via lldb-dev wrote: > Also, are these tests passing on Linux? The tests seem to be passing for linux as well. ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-de

[lldb-dev] Looking for info on two rdars: 18684124, 15367233

2015-09-09 Thread Ed Maste via lldb-dev
Two tests are currently decorated with a @unittest2.expectedFailure referencing rdar tickets. These tests pass consistently for me on FreeBSD. Can I ask the Apple folks to look at these tickets and put details in a public PR if appropriate? Alternatively, shall I switch the tests to expectedFailure

[lldb-dev] [Bug 24759] New: The example "Using the lldb.py module in python" is not working on Linux

2015-09-09 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24759 Bug ID: 24759 Summary: The example "Using the lldb.py module in python" is not working on Linux Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux