[Lldb-commits] [lld] [lldb] [NFC] Address more bit-field storage sizes (PR #140493)

@@ -99,15 +99,15 @@ class InputChunk { // the beginning of the output section this chunk was assigned to. int32_t outSecOff = 0; - uint8_t sectionKind : 3; + uint32_t sectionKind : 3; sbc100 wrote: Can you explain why `uint32_t` is better than `uint8_t`

[Lldb-commits] [lld] [lldb] [NFC] Address more bit-field storage sizes (PR #140493)

@@ -99,15 +99,15 @@ class InputChunk { // the beginning of the output section this chunk was assigned to. int32_t outSecOff = 0; - uint8_t sectionKind : 3; + uint32_t sectionKind : 3; sbc100 wrote: (Perhaps some background in the PR description would be

[Lldb-commits] [lld] [lldb] [NFC] Address more bit-field storage sizes (PR #140493)

@@ -99,15 +99,15 @@ class InputChunk { // the beginning of the output section this chunk was assigned to. int32_t outSecOff = 0; - uint8_t sectionKind : 3; + uint32_t sectionKind : 3; sbc100 wrote: By MS ABI I assume you mean mircrosoft? I guess this