inglorion added a comment.
I also think we should revert this change while we think about the approach.
I've been reluctant to do this because I was impressed by how many bytes of
output it saves, and I didn't want to lose that just because it doesn't play
nice with ThinLTO. However, after some
inglorion added a comment.
Reverted in r360955.
Repository:
rL LLVM
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54747/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54747
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org