@@ -4892,6 +4894,21 @@ void TargetProperties::SetDebugUtilityExpression(bool
debug) {
SetPropertyAtIndex(idx, debug);
}
+Args TargetProperties::GetDebugInfoDURLs() const {
+ Args urls;
+ m_collection_sp->GetPropertyAtIndexAsArgs(ePropertyDebugInfoDURLs, urls);
+ return u
@@ -396,8 +398,22 @@ Symbols::LocateExecutableSymbolFile(const ModuleSpec
&module_spec,
}
}
}
-
- return LocateExecutableSymbolFileDsym(module_spec);
+ FileSpec dsym_bundle = LocateExecutableSymbolFileDsym(module_spec);
+ if (dsym_bundle)
+return dsym_bundle
@@ -396,8 +398,22 @@ Symbols::LocateExecutableSymbolFile(const ModuleSpec
&module_spec,
}
}
}
-
- return LocateExecutableSymbolFileDsym(module_spec);
+ FileSpec dsym_bundle = LocateExecutableSymbolFileDsym(module_spec);
+ if (dsym_bundle)
+return dsym_bundle
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ add_lldb_library(lldbSymbol NO_PLUGIN_DEPENDENCIES
lldbHost
lldbTarget
lldbUtility
+LLVMDebuginfod
bulbazord wrote:
Should this be in `LINK_COMPONENTS`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70996
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70734
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -831,6 +831,37 @@ bool
lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallCommandObject(
return true;
}
+bool lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallParsedCommandObject(
+PyObject *implementor, lldb::DebuggerSP debugger,
lldb_private::StructuredDataImp
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
https://github.com/bulbazord commented:
I did an initial pass over your patch but I didn't read the python tests yet
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70734
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
@@ -831,6 +831,37 @@ bool
lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallCommandObject(
return true;
}
+bool lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallParsedCommandObject(
+PyObject *implementor, lldb::DebuggerSP debugger,
lldb_private::StructuredDataImp
@@ -831,6 +831,37 @@ bool
lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallCommandObject(
return true;
}
+bool lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallParsedCommandObject(
+PyObject *implementor, lldb::DebuggerSP debugger,
lldb_private::StructuredDataImp
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
@@ -831,6 +831,37 @@ bool
lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallCommandObject(
return true;
}
+bool lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallParsedCommandObject(
+PyObject *implementor, lldb::DebuggerSP debugger,
lldb_private::StructuredDataImp
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
bulbazord wrote:
```suggestion
The way to
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
@@ -831,6 +831,37 @@ bool
lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallCommandObject(
return true;
}
+bool lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallParsedCommandObject(
+PyObject *implementor, lldb::DebuggerSP debugger,
lldb_private::StructuredDataImp
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
@@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ function(finish_swig_python swig_target
lldb_python_bindings_dir lldb_python_tar
${lldb_python_target_dir}
"utils"
FILES "${LLDB_SOURCE_DIR}/examples/python/in_call_stack.py"
- "${LLDB_SOURCE_DIR}/examples/python/symbolication.py")
+
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
@@ -445,7 +445,11 @@ class SymbolFile : public PluginInterface {
/// contains the keys "type", "symfile", and "separate-debug-info-files".
/// "type" can be used to assume the structure of each object in
/// "separate-debug-info-files".
- virtual bool GetSepa
@@ -445,7 +445,11 @@ class SymbolFile : public PluginInterface {
/// contains the keys "type", "symfile", and "separate-debug-info-files".
/// "type" can be used to assume the structure of each object in
/// "separate-debug-info-files".
- virtual bool GetSepa
https://github.com/bulbazord requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71087
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71087
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -196,13 +196,15 @@ elseif (LLDB_EXPORT_ALL_SYMBOLS)
MESSAGE("-- Symbols (liblldb): exporting all symbols from the lldb and
lldb_private namespaces")
# Pull out the various lldb libraries linked into liblldb, these will be used
- # when looking for symbols to extract.
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71087
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71151
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
LGTM, all my comments were minor things I noticed. Thanks for doing this!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71151
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+//===-- SymbolLocatorDebugSymbols.h --*- C++
+//-*-===//
bulbazord wrote:
Formatting
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71151
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+//===-- SymbolLocatorDefault.cpp
+//--===//
bulbazord wrote:
Formatting
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71151
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-c
@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+//===-- SymbolLocatorDebugSymbols.cpp
+//--===//
bulbazord wrote:
Formatting
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71151
___
lldb-commits mailing list
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+//===-- SymbolLocator.h -*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71128
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71228
AddName gives no feedback other than if it succeeded whereas
AddNameWithErrorHandling gives you back an SBError object. I would like to mark
AddName as deprecated and direct folks to use AddNameWithErorrHandli
https://github.com/bulbazord updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71228
>From e1e99bdf51d559aa9c96cfd733f12b35e8db7728 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Langford
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 13:24:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Deprecate SBBreakpoint::AddName in favor of
AddNameW
https://github.com/bulbazord updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71228
>From e1e99bdf51d559aa9c96cfd733f12b35e8db7728 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Langford
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 13:24:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb] Deprecate SBBreakpoint::AddName in favor of
AddNameW
https://github.com/bulbazord created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71236
The return value is completely unused. Let's just return nothing.
>From 1077476df553c21a88b1cbb80f7fc8635c88ff7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Langford
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:37:07 -0700
Subject: [PATC
bulbazord wrote:
I'll just remove the comment. If we want to make this do error checking, we'll
have to shuffle around even more code than this change does right now. I wanted
to mostly get rid of this piece of cognitive overhead (why does this return
something and why do we drop it on the flo
https://github.com/bulbazord created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71241
By itself this change does very little, but I plan on refactoring something
from StructuredData and it gets much easier with this change.
>From 70ca8af7794b1de998ec3b0145d3e94daac3358e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
https://github.com/bulbazord updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71236
>From 1077476df553c21a88b1cbb80f7fc8635c88ff7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Langford
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:37:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Change Breakpoint::AddName return value
The return v
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
Awesome!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71247
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71258
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -2691,6 +2691,7 @@ class CommandObjectTargetModulesDumpSeparateDebugInfoFiles
"Found unsupported debug info type '%s'.\n",
type.str().c_str());
}
+ strm.EOL();
bulbazord wrote:
This change l
@@ -130,3 +130,29 @@ def test_dwos_not_loaded_table_output(self):
"0x[a-zA-Z0-9]{16}\s+E\s+.*foo\.dwo",
],
)
+
+@skipIfRemote
+@skipIfDarwin
+@skipIfWindows
bulbazord wrote:
This test doesn't actually debug a pro
@@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ class ScriptedProcessInterface : virtual public
ScriptedInterface {
return {llvm::make_error()};
}
+ llvm::SmallVector GetAbstractMethods() const override {
+return {};
+ }
bulbazord wrote:
Same here
https://github.com/llvm/ll
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ class ScriptedPlatformInterface : virtual public
ScriptedInterface {
return {llvm::make_error()};
}
+ llvm::SmallVector GetAbstractMethods() const override {
+return {};
+ }
bulbazord wrote:
I don't think we should implement th
@@ -103,24 +139,79 @@ class ScriptedPythonInterface : virtual public
ScriptedInterface {
"Resulting object is not initialized.");
std::apply(
- [&method, &expected_return_object](auto &&...args) {
+ [&init, &expected_r
@@ -103,24 +139,79 @@ class ScriptedPythonInterface : virtual public
ScriptedInterface {
"Resulting object is not initialized.");
std::apply(
- [&method, &expected_return_object](auto &&...args) {
+ [&init, &expected_r
@@ -32,6 +32,42 @@ class ScriptedPythonInterface : virtual public
ScriptedInterface {
ScriptedPythonInterface(ScriptInterpreterPythonImpl &interpreter);
~ScriptedPythonInterface() override = default;
+ enum class AbstractMethodCheckerCases {
+eNotImplemented,
+eN
@@ -103,24 +139,79 @@ class ScriptedPythonInterface : virtual public
ScriptedInterface {
"Resulting object is not initialized.");
std::apply(
- [&method, &expected_return_object](auto &&...args) {
+ [&init, &expected_r
@@ -663,6 +663,18 @@ bool PythonDictionary::Check(PyObject *py_obj) {
return PyDict_Check(py_obj);
}
+bool PythonDictionary::HasKey(const llvm::Twine &key) const {
bulbazord wrote:
Why a `Twine` and not a `StringRef`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/p
@@ -32,6 +32,42 @@ class ScriptedPythonInterface : virtual public
ScriptedInterface {
ScriptedPythonInterface(ScriptInterpreterPythonImpl &interpreter);
~ScriptedPythonInterface() override = default;
+ enum class AbstractMethodCheckerCases {
+eNotImplemented,
+eN
@@ -663,6 +663,18 @@ bool PythonDictionary::Check(PyObject *py_obj) {
return PyDict_Check(py_obj);
}
+bool PythonDictionary::HasKey(const llvm::Twine &key) const {
+ if (!IsValid())
+return false;
+ PythonString key_object(key.str().data());
bulbazord
@@ -103,24 +139,79 @@ class ScriptedPythonInterface : virtual public
ScriptedInterface {
"Resulting object is not initialized.");
std::apply(
- [&method, &expected_return_object](auto &&...args) {
+ [&init, &expected_r
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+import os
+
+
+class MissingMethodsScriptedProcess:
+def __init__(self, exe_ctx, args):
+pass
+
+
+def __lldb_init_module(debugger, dict):
+if not "SKIP_SCRIPTED_PROCESS_LAUNCH" in os.environ:
bulbazord wrote:
Instead of doing th
@@ -60,6 +60,52 @@ def move_blueprint_to_dsym(self, blueprint_name):
)
shutil.copy(blueprint_origin_path, blueprint_destination_path)
+def test_missing_methods_scripted_register_context(self):
+"""Test that we only instanciate scripted processes if
@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ class ScriptedThreadInterface : virtual public
ScriptedInterface {
return {llvm::make_error()};
}
+ llvm::SmallVector GetAbstractMethods() const override {
+return {};
+ }
bulbazord wrote:
Same here
https://github.com/llvm/llv
@@ -130,3 +130,29 @@ def test_dwos_not_loaded_table_output(self):
"0x[a-zA-Z0-9]{16}\s+E\s+.*foo\.dwo",
],
)
+
+@skipIfRemote
+@skipIfDarwin
+@skipIfWindows
bulbazord wrote:
In that case, we should figure out if
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
🚢
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71266
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71267
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71267
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ typedef std::optional
(*SymbolLocatorFindSymbolFileInBundle)(
const FileSpec &dsym_bundle_fspec, const UUID *uuid, const ArchSpec *arch);
typedef std::optional (*SymbolLocatorLocateExecutableSymbolFile)(
const ModuleSpec &module_spec, const FileSpecL
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
🚀
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71301
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71372
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -130,3 +130,29 @@ def test_dwos_not_loaded_table_output(self):
"0x[a-zA-Z0-9]{16}\s+E\s+.*foo\.dwo",
],
)
+
+@skipIfRemote
+@skipIfDarwin
+@skipIfWindows
bulbazord wrote:
The TestDumpOso is good, but I was mor
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ class ScriptedPlatformInterface : virtual public
ScriptedInterface {
return {llvm::make_error()};
}
+ llvm::SmallVector GetAbstractMethods() const override {
+return {};
+ }
bulbazord wrote:
This is probably a gap in my underst
@@ -60,6 +60,52 @@ def move_blueprint_to_dsym(self, blueprint_name):
)
shutil.copy(blueprint_origin_path, blueprint_destination_path)
+def test_missing_methods_scripted_register_context(self):
+"""Test that we only instanciate scripted processes if
@@ -663,6 +663,18 @@ bool PythonDictionary::Check(PyObject *py_obj) {
return PyDict_Check(py_obj);
}
+bool PythonDictionary::HasKey(const llvm::Twine &key) const {
bulbazord wrote:
You could avoid a potential allocation with the creation of the `PythonStrin
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+//===-- RegisterFlagsLinux_arm64.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -67,6 +70,21 @@
RegisterContextCorePOSIX_arm64::RegisterContextCorePOSIX_arm64(
: RegisterContextPOSIX_arm64(thread, std::move(register_info)) {
::memset(&m_sme_pseudo_regs, 0, sizeof(m_sme_pseudo_regs));
+ ProcessElfCore *process =
+ static_cast(thread.GetProc
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+//===-- RegisterFlagsLinux_arm64.h --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
Works for me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71402
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71402
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -89,12 +89,18 @@ class DynamicRegisterInfo {
GetRegisterInfo(llvm::StringRef reg_name) const;
typedef std::vector reg_collection;
- llvm::iterator_range registers() const {
-return llvm::iterator_range(m_regs);
+
+ template T registers();
bulbazo
https://github.com/bulbazord closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71241
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
bulbazord wrote:
@jimingham Does this work for you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71236
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
I'm on board
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71260
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
This more closely matches my intuition for how I would expect this inheritance
hierarchy to be set up.
If I wanted to add `ScriptedLuaProcessInterface` (as an example), what would I
need to do?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71455
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71456
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71456
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+//===-- Checksum.h --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+//===-- Checksum.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+//===-- Checksum.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+//===-- Checksum.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -72,7 +75,8 @@ class FileSpec {
/// The style of the path
///
/// \see FileSpec::SetFile (const char *path)
- explicit FileSpec(llvm::StringRef path, Style style = Style::native);
+ explicit FileSpec(llvm::StringRef path, Style style = Style::native,
+
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71457
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord commented:
You pushed a commit from a different PR btw
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71457
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
the dwarf line tables patch LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71458
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-com
https://github.com/bulbazord created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71477
BreakpointResolver::CreateFromStructuredData returns a BreakpointResolverSP,
but all of the subclasses return raw pointers. Instead of creating a raw
pointer and shoving it into a shared pointer, it seems reas
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71559
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -2594,34 +2594,30 @@ ValueObjectSP
ValueObject::CreateConstantValue(ConstString name) {
ValueObjectSP ValueObject::GetQualifiedRepresentationIfAvailable(
lldb::DynamicValueType dynValue, bool synthValue) {
- ValueObjectSP result_sp(GetSP());
-
+ ValueObjectSP result_
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71559
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70935
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70300
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71477
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71613
This patch changes the interface of
StructuredData::Array::GetItemAtIndexAsString to return a
`std::optional` instead of taking an out parameter. More
generally, this commit serves as proposal that we change a
1101 - 1200 of 1590 matches
Mail list logo