https://github.com/sga-sc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131293
>From cb1c55bd6015520a1b0834546d083f22823d1d2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Georgiy Samoylov
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 19:21:22 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Adapted test for remote debugging case
---
.../Py
@@ -1064,6 +1065,29 @@ const char *Process::GetExitDescription() {
bool Process::SetExitStatus(int status, llvm::StringRef exit_string) {
// Use a mutex to protect setting the exit status.
std::lock_guard guard(m_exit_status_mutex);
+ telemetry::ScopedDispatcher helper;
+
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Vy Nguyen (oontvoo)
Changes
New changes: add check to avoid accessing invalid obj
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132043.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/include/lldb/Core/Telemetry.h (+68-6)
- (modifi
https://github.com/oontvoo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132043
New changes: add check to avoid accessing invalid obj
>From 9f0a47af2b7fdb90e4fa4cc7f8f97c840af1d2bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vy Nguyen
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:44:12 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Reapply
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
🚚
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132008
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 67a01131a8d70fcd06c6bd9cea30a8a6262c8c94
8a84a2e3328d7058917a63693632bacb0357f639 --e
@@ -463,6 +463,8 @@ void InitializeRequestHandler::operator()(
body.try_emplace("supportsDataBreakpoints", true);
// The debug adapter supports the `readMemory` request.
body.try_emplace("supportsReadMemoryRequest", true);
+ // The debug adapter supports the 'writeMemory
@@ -112,3 +112,23 @@ def test_readMemory(self):
# Reads at offset 0x0 fail
mem = self.dap_server.request_readMemory("0x0", 0, 6)
self.assertEqual(mem["success"], False)
+
+def test_writeMemory(self):
+"""
+Tests the 'writeMemory' requ
https://github.com/ashgti updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131916
>From 6aa311afe9832bbd4a4118874e411243b05e490d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Harrison
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 14:03:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [lldb-dap] Ensure logging statements are written as a
single
rocallahan wrote:
> Btw, the x86_64 macOS bots are still failing:
> https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/10698/execution/node/102/log/?consoleFull
Where is this reported? I did not see it in any of the commit annotations in
Github.
> I think it'd make sense for the
https://github.com/oontvoo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131203
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+//===-- WriteMemoryRequestHandler.cpp
+//--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/JDevlieghere closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132111
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
felipepiovezan wrote:
> oh, that regression test will need to be added to the swiftlang cherrypick.
Nice! I've added it to that PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132079
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
https://github.com/JDevlieghere created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132119
This moves two functions from Platform to Host:
1. GetCurrentXcodeToolchainDirectory
2. GetCurrentCommandLineToolsDirectory.
These two functions caused a layering violation in the Swift fork, which add
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2025-03-19T15:59:56-07:00
New Revision: 2e5a751ee95026dab7056f779e4df3fc75e8803a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2e5a751ee95026dab7056f779e4df3fc75e8803a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2e5a751ee95026dab7056f779e4df3fc75e8803a.d
JDevlieghere wrote:
> Looking [around
> llvm](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Allvm%2Fllvm-project%20HAVE_LIBPTHREAD&type=code)
> is this the only place using that check? Could this be cleaned up in other
> places as well?
Yeah, I can't find any other uses. Let me remove that in a separate
https://github.com/ashgti approved this pull request.
Looking [around
llvm](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Allvm%2Fllvm-project%20HAVE_LIBPTHREAD&type=code)
is this the only place using that check? Could this be cleaned up in other
places as well?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/
Author: Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan
Date: 2025-03-19T20:07:28-03:00
New Revision: 09b0e5624c7673cffd84a497c4b6ac7a41c59269
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09b0e5624c7673cffd84a497c4b6ac7a41c59269
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09b0e5624c7673cffd84a497c4b6ac7a4
https://github.com/DanielCChen closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131200
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jasonmolenda created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132128
This fixes an uncommon bug with debugserver controlling an inferior process
that is hitting an internal breakpoint & continuing when multiple interrupts
are sent by SB API to lldb. In the reproducing setu
https://github.com/DanielCChen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131200
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/ashgti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131820
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jasonmolenda edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132128
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
JDevlieghere wrote:
I left a few small comments but overall this looks good.
The approach is slightly different from how I expected you to implement this.
Note that I don't know if it's actually better, it's more of a "if I had to
implement this, that's how I would have started." You've been
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2025-03-19T22:22:01-07:00
New Revision: 460c0f567cc83378d4aafd9fba95561bacf57fe4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/460c0f567cc83378d4aafd9fba95561bacf57fe4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/460c0f567cc83378d4aafd9fba95561bacf57fe4.d
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2025-03-19T12:22:26+01:00
New Revision: 571e4de02ee527ef6d0399008fb57440e51c5d22
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/571e4de02ee527ef6d0399008fb57440e51c5d22
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/571e4de02ee527ef6d0399008fb57440e51c5d22.diff
https://github.com/labath closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131150
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-hexagon
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
This is the mechanical part of #131150.
I'm also removing the interfaces taking a RowSP.
---
Patch is 46.65 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pu
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
This is the mechanical part of #131150.
I'm also removing the interfaces taking a RowSP.
---
Patch is 46.65 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132008.d
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132008
This is the mechanical part of #131150.
I'm also removing the interfaces taking a RowSP.
>From bbd56611f21f3ed65b7c31d562500776645a3e15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:40:3
https://github.com/vogelsgesang approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131917
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/felipepiovezan edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131800
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/labath approved this pull request.
Good idea. I don't think it's even a question of "shipping" as swig processing
happens at (lldb) build time. After that, we don't care whether the header
exists or not.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131934
__
https://github.com/slydiman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131645
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Michael137 wrote:
Btw, the x86_64 macOS bots are still failing:
https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/10698/execution/node/102/log/?consoleFull
```
Failed Tests (2):
lldb-api ::
functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py
lldb-api ::
funct
@@ -1692,6 +1692,20 @@ class Target : public
std::enable_shared_from_this,
}
};
+/// The private implementation backing SBLock.
+struct APILock {
+ APILock(std::recursive_mutex &mutex) : lock(mutex) {}
+ std::lock_guard lock;
+};
+
+/// The private implementation used by
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2025-03-19T09:51:10+01:00
New Revision: 7dbcdd578cd4d37b1f4094dbd17556be6382f1cc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7dbcdd578cd4d37b1f4094dbd17556be6382f1cc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7dbcdd578cd4d37b1f4094dbd17556be6382f1cc.diff
https://github.com/labath updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131597
>From 9874a78efa086dfc3168a514051a521964ad55f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:12:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Fix prologue size calculation for discontinuous
functi
@@ -662,10 +662,12 @@ uint32_t Function::GetPrologueByteSize() {
}
}
-const addr_t func_start_file_addr =
-m_range.GetBaseAddress().GetFileAddress();
-const addr_t func_end_file_addr =
-func_start_file_addr + m_range.Ge
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2025-03-19T13:35:14+01:00
New Revision: 861efd4b3f93d30d353f0a6eea249fbdac1778a0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/861efd4b3f93d30d353f0a6eea249fbdac1778a0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/861efd4b3f93d30d353f0a6eea249fbdac1778a0.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+//===-- WriteMemoryRequestHandler.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: A
labath wrote:
> Should we perhaps skip this on intel+macOS?
861efd4b3f93d30d353f0a6eea249fbdac1778a0
> Maybe disabling tests for macOS < 15 would be OK even in the long term? There
> isn't any looming plan to actually use this code on macOS < 15. The main
> reason to run these tests on non-
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+//===-- WriteMemoryRequestHandler.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: A
https://github.com/sga-sc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131293
>From 09aa2a57cdc4be801589141390c02d0f1991cf45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Georgiy Samoylov
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:50:00 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Rewrote with lldbutil function
---
.../tools/lldb
@@ -743,6 +743,20 @@ def getBuildArtifact(self, name="a.out"):
"""Return absolute path to an artifact in the test's build
directory."""
return os.path.join(self.getBuildDir(), name)
+def get_process_working_directory(self):
+"""Get the working dire
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ def test_default(self):
lines = output.splitlines()
self.assertIn(program, lines[0], "make sure program path is in first
argument")
+@skipIfWindows
vogelsgesang wrote:
why? Did this work previously and was now broken by
@@ -463,6 +463,8 @@ void InitializeRequestHandler::operator()(
body.try_emplace("supportsDataBreakpoints", true);
// The debug adapter supports the `readMemory` request.
body.try_emplace("supportsReadMemoryRequest", true);
+ // The debug adapter supports the `cancel` req
https://github.com/vogelsgesang edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130169
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -743,6 +743,20 @@ def getBuildArtifact(self, name="a.out"):
"""Return absolute path to an artifact in the test's build
directory."""
return os.path.join(self.getBuildDir(), name)
+def get_process_working_directory(self):
+"""Get the working dire
@@ -316,6 +316,36 @@ struct Source {
bool fromJSON(const llvm::json::Value &, Source &, llvm::json::Path);
llvm::json::Value toJSON(const Source &);
+// MARK: Events
+
+// "ExitedEvent": {
+// "allOf": [ { "$ref": "#/definitions/Event" }, {
+// "type": "object",
+//
https://github.com/labath updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127661
>From 064801d84f1b4ae0255d666b7f846d0f8e034cd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:14:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] s/ValidRange/ValidRanges in UnwindPlan
To be able to descr
@@ -1692,6 +1692,20 @@ class Target : public
std::enable_shared_from_this,
}
};
+/// The private implementation backing SBLock.
+struct APILock {
+ APILock(std::recursive_mutex &mutex) : lock(mutex) {}
+ std::lock_guard lock;
+};
+
+/// The private implementation used by
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: David Peixotto (dmpots)
Changes
This commit modifes the `getSourceDir()` and `getBuildDir()` functions to use
os.path.realpath to resolve symlinks in the Base test class used for API tests.
A few tests were failing when the build and sourc
JDevlieghere wrote:
> The one remaining question seems to be: Should we also support (and test)
> this API from Python? Also see comments in the RFC
Yup, this patch now makes SBlock available from Python and Lua. I didn't add
the test yet because I wanted to add the `__enter__` and `__exit__`
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127661
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/ashgti closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131916
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/ashgti closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130104
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131404
>From ab4700b007becba1dfe63310bbb2a627214b6a60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:39:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Expose the Target API lock through the SB API
-
https://github.com/igorkudrin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131979
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
JDevlieghere wrote:
Rebased + implement the Python extension.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131404
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131404
>From 180e736b110c3ba6ba36719326138b6cece5a51b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:19:58 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Expose the Target API lock through the SB API
-
@@ -394,6 +394,13 @@ class TestGetTargetBreakpointsRequestHandler : public
LegacyRequestHandler {
void operator()(const llvm::json::Object &request) const override;
};
+class WriteMemoryRequestHandler : public LegacyRequestHandler {
+public:
+ using LegacyRequestHandler::L
https://github.com/oontvoo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132043
>From 9f0a47af2b7fdb90e4fa4cc7f8f97c840af1d2bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vy Nguyen
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:44:12 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Reapply "[LLDB][Telemetry]Define TargetInfo for
collecting data
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131979
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -316,6 +316,36 @@ struct Source {
bool fromJSON(const llvm::json::Value &, Source &, llvm::json::Path);
llvm::json::Value toJSON(const Source &);
+// MARK: Events
+
+// "ExitedEvent": {
+// "allOf": [ { "$ref": "#/definitions/Event" }, {
+// "type": "object",
+//
MacDue wrote:
`kon72` does not have commit access, so @labath you should probably land this
if you know the change is correct :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131388
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.
https://github.com/JDevlieghere edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131404
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -1692,6 +1692,20 @@ class Target : public
std::enable_shared_from_this,
}
};
+/// The private implementation backing SBLock.
+struct APILock {
+ APILock(std::recursive_mutex &mutex) : lock(mutex) {}
+ std::lock_guard lock;
+};
+
+/// The private implementation used by
@@ -96,7 +115,7 @@ Expected> Transport::Read() {
return createStringError(
formatv("invalid content length {0}", *raw_length).str());
- Expected raw_json = ReadFull(*input, length);
ashgti wrote:
Also, frustrating on Windows stdin is an anonymous
https://github.com/kastiglione approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132079
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
kastiglione wrote:
oh, that regression test will need to be added to the swiftlang cherrypick.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132079
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ll
vogelsgesang wrote:
The one remaining question seems to be: Should we also support (and test) this
from Python? Also see comments in the RFC
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131404
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
htt
kastiglione wrote:
Here's a regression test:
```
diff --git a/lldb/test/API/lang/swift/async/expr/TestSwiftAsyncExpressions.py
b/lldb/test/API/lang/swift/async/expr/TestSwiftAsyncExpressions.py
index 1510faa5820d..8cc699b3f0bf 100644
--- a/lldb/test/API/lang/swift/async/expr/TestSwiftAsyncExpre
jimingham wrote:
> > I think something like that might work.
>
> Clarification: that will work only for cases if there are `VariableObject`
> for each variable and they are checked. If, for instance, non-persistent
> variable holds reference to persistent variable and only `MemoryCacheId` is
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+//===-- WriteMemoryRequestHandler.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: A
https://github.com/oontvoo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129728
>From 21103adacdf9c08cee4065f8a6b90ff812fefbb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vy Nguyen
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 11:01:46 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [LLDB][Telemetry] Collect telemetry from client when
allowed.
T
oontvoo wrote:
@labath Hi, friendly ping? thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132043
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132079
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/vogelsgesang edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130169
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: John Harrison
Date: 2025-03-19T08:49:52-07:00
New Revision: 5720a792a950f46a9b1ebdf0b658b76dc02a9833
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5720a792a950f46a9b1ebdf0b658b76dc02a9833
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5720a792a950f46a9b1ebdf0b658b76dc02a9833.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+//===-- DAPLog.cpp
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/ashgti closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131917
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DanielCChen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131200
>From 55653ee989d41d4caf5ba5396bb2406dcc443945 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Chen
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:52:23 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [compiler-rt] Disable
LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DI
@@ -96,7 +115,7 @@ Expected> Transport::Read() {
return createStringError(
formatv("invalid content length {0}", *raw_length).str());
- Expected raw_json = ReadFull(*input, length);
vogelsgesang wrote:
we should probably only apply a timeout befo
@@ -112,3 +112,23 @@ def test_readMemory(self):
# Reads at offset 0x0 fail
mem = self.dap_server.request_readMemory("0x0", 0, 6)
self.assertEqual(mem["success"], False)
+
+def test_writeMemory(self):
+"""
+Tests the 'writeMemory' requ
https://github.com/felipepiovezan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132079
These allow for more efficient saving/restoring state after an expression is
evaluated.
>From e619ec8d09fec2e0567ad6194f60968e89e40627 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan
Date: Wed
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan (felipepiovezan)
Changes
These allow for more efficient saving/restoring state after an expression is
evaluated.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132079.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modifi
88 matches
Mail list logo
